Differences between revisions 1 and 2
Revision 1 as of 2007-09-30 00:44:23
Size: 2925
Editor: ?JunichiUekawa
Comment: create from template
Revision 2 as of 2009-03-16 03:32:53
Size: 2935
Editor: anonymous
Comment: converted to 1.6 markup
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 3: Line 3:
The purpose of this page is to demonstrate that '''sh''' meets the [http://release.debian.org/lenny_arch_policy.html architecture recertification criteria for lenny]. The purpose of this page is to demonstrate that '''sh''' meets the [[http://release.debian.org/lenny_arch_policy.html|architecture recertification criteria for lenny]].
Line 10: Line 10:
 1. [http://www.example.com/ some vendor]
 2. [http://www.example.com/ some other vendor]
 1. [[http://www.example.com/|some vendor]]
 2. [[http://www.example.com/|some other vendor]]
Line 55: Line 55:
 * The port is currently at xx% up to date according to [http://buildd.debian.org/stats/graph2-week.png the buildd stats] (95% cut off)
 * The port has currently built xx% of the archive according to [http://buildd.debian.org/stats/graph-week.png the buildd stats] (90% cut off)
 * The port is currently at xx% up to date according to [[http://buildd.debian.org/stats/graph2-week.png|the buildd stats]] (95% cut off)
 * The port has currently built xx% of the archive according to [[http://buildd.debian.org/stats/graph-week.png|the buildd stats]] (90% cut off)

Purpose

The purpose of this page is to demonstrate that sh meets the architecture recertification criteria for lenny.

If some of these requirements are irrelevant or implausible for the port, please add a waiver request indicating why and how this isn't a problem for the arch in bold.

Availability

The architecture is publicly available without NDAs via:

  1. some vendor

  2. some other vendor

Developer machines

The following machines are available to developers:

  1. foo.debian.org - maintained by ..., connectivity via two tin cans and some string.

Port maintainers

The Debian port is maintained by the following developers, who actively work on architecture specific issues:

  1. ...
  2. ...
  3. ...
  4. ...
  5. ...

Users

The port is being actively used at the following sites:

  1. foo: xx machines, yy users, personal workstations
  2. bar: 1 machine, yyy users, development server
  3. ...

Popcon indicates zz users of the architecture as at 2005/xx/yy.

Installer

The installer is being maintained by ... and it's currently working effectively. Successful installation reports are available at: ...

Upstream support

Upstream support is provided by:

  • glibc: ...
  • gcc: ...
  • g++: ...
  • kernel: ...
  • boot loader: ...
  • ...

Archive coverage and Autobuilder support

  • The port is currently at xx% up to date according to the buildd stats (95% cut off)

  • The port has currently built xx% of the archive according to the buildd stats (90% cut off)

Archive cleanliness

The port builds from unmodified Debian source.

Autobuilders

The following machines run buildds for the port:

  • oldstable (oldstable-proposed-updates, oldstable-security)
    • foo.debian.org - connectivity via ..., buildd logs checked by ..., adminned by ...
  • stable (proposed-updates, stable-security)
    • foo.debian.org - connectivity via ..., buildd logs checked by ..., adminned by ...
  • testing (testing-proposed-updates, testing-security)
    • foo.debian.org - connectivity via ..., buildd logs checked by ..., adminned by ...
  • unstable
    • foo.debian.org - connectivity via ..., buildd logs checked by ..., adminned by ...

Vetoes

The security team have noted the following problems in supporting the architecture:

  • None

The Debian admin team have noted the following problems in supporting the architecture:

  • None

The stable release team have noted the following problems in supporting the architecture:

  • None

The release team have noted the following problems in supporting the architecture:

  • None


CategoryLennyReleaseRecertification