Differences between revisions 1 and 3 (spanning 2 versions)
Revision 1 as of 2007-09-19 14:53:16
Size: 1193
Editor: madduck
Revision 3 as of 2009-03-16 03:30:22
Size: 57
Editor: anonymous
Comment: converted to 1.6 markup
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
= Maintenance =

OSS projects/tools are moving targets, and no software is bugfree or fulfills
every need. Choosing a tool for daily work requires the investment of time and
effort to learn the tool and fit it into one's workflow. Such an investment
should be future-proof, which calls into consideration the maintenance status
of a tool.

== Activity ==

Does the project seem alive? Note that e.g. sheer volume of mails on a list
may not be a good enough indicator, since a mature project may only see
discussion on the occasion of a found bug, or the like. A much better
indicator might be the responsiveness to such issues: how quickly are list
posts followed up on? How old are the bug reports? How responsive is the
maintainer/author/core team when prompted directly?

== Releases ==

How long are the release cycles and are they time- or feature-based? Does the
project release snapshots? Does it maintain separate releases for stable and
unstable/in progress code? Is the code repository public and is an effort made
to make sure the code checked in compiles and runs?

== Bug tracking ==

Does the project use a publicly available (and usable) bug tracker?
OBSOLETED BY http://phd.martin-krafft.net/wiki/factors/