Differences between revisions 6 and 7
Revision 6 as of 2008-07-20 08:25:53
Size: 2849
Editor: ?TollefFogHeen
Comment: ravel is no more, and hasn't been for some time.
Revision 7 as of 2009-03-16 03:31:47
Size: 2859
Editor: anonymous
Comment: converted to 1.6 markup
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 3: Line 3:
The purpose of this page is to demonstrate that '''amd64''' meets the [http://release.debian.org/lenny_arch_policy.html architecture recertification criteria for lenny]. The purpose of this page is to demonstrate that '''amd64''' meets the [[http://release.debian.org/lenny_arch_policy.html|architecture recertification criteria for lenny]].
Line 10: Line 10:
 1. [http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/ProductInformation/0,,30_118_9331,00.html AMD]
 2. [http://www.intel.com/technology/architecture-silicon/intel64/index.htm Intel]
 1. [[http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/ProductInformation/0,,30_118_9331,00.html|AMD]]
 2. [[http://www.intel.com/technology/architecture-silicon/intel64/index.htm|Intel]]
Line 55: Line 55:
 * The port is currently at 99% up to date according to [http://buildd.debian.org/stats/graph2-week.png the buildd stats] (95% cut off)
 * The port has currently built 98% of the archive according to [http://buildd.debian.org/stats/graph-week.png the buildd stats] (90% cut off)
 * The port is currently at 99% up to date according to [[http://buildd.debian.org/stats/graph2-week.png|the buildd stats]] (95% cut off)
 * The port has currently built 98% of the archive according to [[http://buildd.debian.org/stats/graph-week.png|the buildd stats]] (90% cut off)

Purpose

The purpose of this page is to demonstrate that amd64 meets the architecture recertification criteria for lenny.

If some of these requirements are irrelevant or implausible for the port, please add a waiver request indicating why and how this isn't a problem for the arch in bold.

Availability

The architecture is publicly available without NDAs via:

  1. AMD

  2. Intel

Developer machines

The following machines are available to developers: The following machines are available to developers:

  1. pergolesi.debian.org - maintained by DSA, connectivity via freenet-ag.de.

Port maintainers

The Debian port is maintained by the following developers, who actively work on architecture specific issues:

  1. Kurt Roeckx
  2. Frederik Schüler
  3. ...
  4. ...
  5. ...

Users

The port is being actively used at the following sites:

  1. ...

Popcon indicates 6479 users of the architecture as at 2007/07/30.

Installer

The installer is being maintained by ... and it's currently working effectively. Successful installation reports are available at: ...

Upstream support

Upstream support is provided by:

  • glibc: ...
  • gcc: ...
  • g++: ...
  • kernel: ...
  • boot loader: ...
  • ...

Archive coverage and Autobuilder support

  • The port is currently at 99% up to date according to the buildd stats (95% cut off)

  • The port has currently built 98% of the archive according to the buildd stats (90% cut off)

Archive cleanliness

The port builds from unmodified Debian source.

Autobuilders

The following machines run buildds for the port:

  • oldstable (oldstable-proposed-updates, oldstable-security)
    • not on debian.org
  • stable (proposed-updates, stable-security)
    • excelsior
  • testing (testing-proposed-updates, testing-security)
    • excelsior
  • unstable
    • excelsior
    • nautilus
  • excelsior - connectivity via ..., adminned by Kurt Roeckx
  • nautilus - connectivity via 100Mbit colocation, adminned by Frederik Schueler

Vetoes

The security team have noted the following problems in supporting the architecture:

  • None

The Debian admin team have noted the following problems in supporting the architecture:

  • None

The stable release team have noted the following problems in supporting the architecture:

  • None

The release team have noted the following problems in supporting the architecture:

  • None


CategoryLennyReleaseRecertification