Differences between revisions 10 and 11
Revision 10 as of 2006-02-12 18:11:29
Size: 954
Editor: ?MiroslavKure
Comment:
Revision 11 as of 2006-02-13 19:56:56
Size: 1060
Editor: ?FransPop
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 2: Line 2:

== Unconfirmed ==
||<tablewidth="80%">||<:80%>''Additional information''||
||<^>mlterm||According to [http://bugs.debian.org/352662 #352662] does not display Japanese correctly||
Line 5: Line 9:
||<^>a2ps||[http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=180236 #180236]|| ||<^>a2ps||[http://bugs.debian.org/180236 #180236]||
Line 7: Line 11:
||<^>dselect||[http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=237675 #237675]|| ||<^>dselect||[http://bugs.debian.org/237675 #237675]||
Line 9: Line 13:
||<^>hnb||[http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=277994 #277994]|| ||<^>hnb||[http://bugs.debian.org/277994 #277994]||

List of UTF-8 broken applications in Debian

Unconfirmed

Additional information

mlterm

According to [http://bugs.debian.org/352662 #352662] does not display Japanese correctly

Pending

Additional information

a2ps

[http://bugs.debian.org/180236 #180236]

aterm

dselect

[http://bugs.debian.org/237675 #237675]

gnobog

hnb

[http://bugs.debian.org/277994 #277994]

mc

whacky patch [http://bugs.debian.org/242194 exists], Ubuntu [http://people.ubuntu.com/~scott/patches/mc/ uses it], upstream waits for proper solution

nvi

vile

xmessage, xmore

zile

upstream: "Unicode support is planned"

man

info page uses U2018 et U2019 chars which aren't in many console fonts.

aptitude

has the same minor problem

Resolved

Additional information

aptitude

since 0.4.0 (resp. devel 0.3.x)

most

since 4.10.2-2