Differences between revisions 2 and 3
Revision 2 as of 2007-10-15 18:24:34
Size: 1611
Comment:
Revision 3 as of 2007-10-15 18:31:50
Size: 1656
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 4: Line 4:
As already announced to all interested maintainers whose packages depends on Tcl/Tk As already announced to all interested maintainers whose packages depend on Tcl/Tk,
Line 7: Line 7:
the larger audience of maintainers in order to inform also people who the larger audience of all maintainers in order to inform also people who
Line 14: Line 14:
as generated daily. It starts to be in good shape and near its final form.
Comments and improvements are welcome, of course. The new policy tries to
be as much as possible backward compatible, but there is an aspect which
will introduce a breakage with the past (the removing of /usr/lib among
$auto_path list), mainly introduced to solve current performance-impacting
situation and also to have Tcl/Tk stuff more FHS complaint.
and is generated daily. It starts to be in good shape and near its final form.
Comments and improvements are welcome, of course.

The new policy tries to be as much as possible backward compatible, but there
is at least an aspect which
will introduce a breakage with the past (the removing
of /usr/lib among $auto_path list), mainly introduced to solve current
performance-impacting situation and also to have Tcl/Tk stuff more FHS compliant.
Line 29: Line 30:
Thanks to Sergei Golovan, the new policy is yet largely implemented in
the subversion repository and an experimental upload will be done as
soon as possible to allow wide testing among Tclers before introducing
new core packages in sid.
Thanks to Sergei Golovan, the new policy is yet almost implemented in
the subversion repository for the core packages and an experimental
upload will happen as soon as possible to allow wide testing among
Tclers before introducing new core packages in sid.

Hi Debianers

As already announced to all interested maintainers whose packages depend on Tcl/Tk,
there is an ongoing effort of drafting a policy for team maintainance of Tcl/Tk
main packages and their modules/extensions. This is now an announce to
the larger audience of all maintainers in order to inform also people who
could be interested in packaging Tcl/Tk related packages in the next future.

Current draft is available at

http://pkg-tcltk.alioth.debian.org/tcltk-policy.html/

and is generated daily. It starts to be in good shape and near its final form.
Comments and improvements are welcome, of course. 

The new policy tries to be as much as possible backward compatible, but there 
is at least an aspect which will introduce a breakage with the past (the removing 
of /usr/lib among $auto_path list), mainly introduced to solve current 
performance-impacting situation and also to have Tcl/Tk stuff more FHS compliant.

Interested maintainers are already informed and we are intentioned to
perform a NMU cycle to solve issues with current packages whenever needed,
in order to have the new policy implemented as our main Lenny goal.

You can find more information about the policy ratios at

http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianTclTk/DebianTclTkPolicyCommentary

Thanks to Sergei Golovan, the new policy is yet almost implemented in
the subversion repository for the core packages and an experimental 
upload will happen as soon as possible to allow wide testing among 
Tclers before introducing new core packages in sid.  

Happy hacking

--
Francesco Lovergine
(in behalf of the Tcl/Tk team)