Differences between revisions 1 and 2
Revision 1 as of 2010-06-05 18:07:25
Size: 320
Editor: meebey
Comment:
Revision 2 as of 2010-06-05 18:57:26
Size: 723
Editor: meebey
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 10: Line 10:

Mono 2.6 release notes says:
System.IO.Packaging
{{{
The WindowsBase assembly which was previously part of the Olive module is now part of the standard Mono distribution. This assembly sole purpose is to provide the System.IO.Packaging API, a .NET API for ZIP files that has recently become popular.
}}}

So Mono 2.6 should probably replace the libmono-windowsbase3.0-cil package of mono-uia.

Packaging Mono 2.6 for Debian

Open Issues

WindowsBase assembly

20:02:15 <meebey> mono 2.6 and mono-uia 1.0 both ship the WindowsBase assembly, which one is the authoritative source of it?
20:02:45 <meebey> should the version in mono 2.6+ replace the older one found in mono-uia 1.0?

Mono 2.6 release notes says: System.IO.Packaging

The WindowsBase assembly which was previously part of the Olive module is now part of the standard Mono distribution. This assembly sole purpose is to provide the System.IO.Packaging API, a .NET API for ZIP files that has recently become popular. 

So Mono 2.6 should probably replace the libmono-windowsbase3.0-cil package of mono-uia.