Differences between revisions 14 and 15
Revision 14 as of 2017-12-22 08:51:47
Size: 1677
Editor: GuillemJover
Comment: This is a field in the header or pseudo-header
Revision 15 as of 2017-12-22 20:58:24
Size: 1711
Editor: PaulWise
Comment: restore comment about the x32 list not existing
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 30: Line 30:
 * x32: debian-x32@lists.debian.org  * x32: debian-x32@lists.debian.org, but the list does not exist yet.

These tags are meant to signal that particular bugs are architecture-specific. Maintainers are encouraged to mark any and all architecture-specific bugs with the below tag, whether or not a fix is available; this will allow porters to get a better overview of the state of their port. When filing architecture-specific bugs, please also ensure that you add an X-Debbugs-CC field listing each of the appropriate porter lists.

The generic format of these tags is:

  • User: ports mailinglist
  • Usertags: port name

The port mailinglist name is usually 'debian-$architecture@lists.debian.org' or 'debian-$archfamily@lists.debian.org'. Examples of the latter include:

There are some exceptions to these rules:

For both kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64 (aka GNU/kFreeBSD) please add the usertag kfreebsd in addition to the architecture names.

For x32 the list does not exist so you should X-Debbugs-CC: debian-amd64@lists.debian.org instead.