Differences between revisions 8 and 24 (spanning 16 versions)
Revision 8 as of 2015-07-17 05:35:43
Size: 1280
Editor: DLange
Comment: added indiebio link
Revision 24 as of 2018-05-24 01:38:26
Size: 2191
Editor: PaulWise
Comment: link to attachment instead of titanpad.com, it is dead
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 5: Line 5:
 * when: 2015-08-13 from 16:00-19:00
 * where: Heidelberg (DebCamp), Room tbd.
 * when: 2015-08-13 16:00
 * where: Heidelberg (DebCamp), Room "Amsterdam"
Line 10: Line 10:
 * [[madduck]]
Line 12: Line 11:
 * madduck
 * Tassia (or another DC Chair)
 * Ganneff
 * nkukard
 * indiebio
Line 19: Line 23:

''DC Chairs comments'': we can use this meeting to discuss our ideas, since communication is usually easier in person than remotely. Though we expect that important discussions will be taken to debconf-team mailing list. No big decision should be taken during an in-person meeting where many of the involved people may not be able to attend (including many orga people busy with DC15 tasks).

''Comment from pre-discussions'': the [[https://wiki.debian.org/Sprints/2015/DebConfDocumentation|DebConf documentation]] effort currently underway will solve some perceived issues and provide a better basis for discussion for others.
Line 28: Line 36:
 * Minutes of meeting: [[attachment:a2vSUuZMR.html]]
Line 36: Line 45:
 * http://opensource.com/business/15/7/building-better-open-source-communities
 * https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/Jobs-temp| indiebio's reviewing of the jobs page
Line 41: Line 52:
== Acknowledgements == == Acknowledgments ==

DebConf orga team Sprint

Location, Date

  • when: 2015-08-13 16:00
  • where: Heidelberg (DebCamp), Room "Amsterdam"

Participants

  • DLange
  • madduck
  • Tassia (or another DC Chair)
  • Ganneff
  • nkukard
  • indiebio

Agenda

  • Openly discuss team structure, roles and friction
  • Define mutual expectations
  • Define common ground and re-assess Goals

  • Agree on communication requirements and individual vs. collective areas of decision making

DC Chairs comments: we can use this meeting to discuss our ideas, since communication is usually easier in person than remotely. Though we expect that important discussions will be taken to debconf-team mailing list. No big decision should be taken during an in-person meeting where many of the involved people may not be able to attend (including many orga people busy with DC15 tasks).

Comment from pre-discussions: the DebConf documentation effort currently underway will solve some perceived issues and provide a better basis for discussion for others.

Second sprint (time tbd. if first one works out)

  • Recap teams re-org
  • Discuss and improve DebConf organisational structure

  • General timeline

Reading list

Inspiration

Acknowledgments

the sprint has been possible thanks to:


CategorySprint