This is a standard that defines an environment variable SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH that distributions can set centrally, and have build tools consume this in order to produce reproducible output.

Before implementing this, you should scan through our checklist to see if you can avoid implementing it.

If you find that it's ideal for your use-case, please feel free to jump straight to our published specification.


Please read our SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH specification for details.

See Standard Environment Variables for more detailed discussion of the rationales behind this mechanism.

Below we also have more detailed discussion about this specific variable, as well as documentation on history and alternative proposals.

Setting the variable

In Debian, this is automatically set to the same time as the latest entry in debian/changelog, i.e. the same as the output of dpkg-parsechangelog -SDate.

  1. For packages using debhelper, versions >= 9.20151004 (791823) exports this variable during builds, so you probably don't need to change anything. One exception is if your debian/rules needs this variable in non-debhelper parts, in which case you can try (3) or (4).

  2. For packages using CDBS, versions >= 0.4.131 (794241) exports this variable during builds, so no changes are needed.

  3. With dpkg >= 1.18.8 (824572) you can either include /usr/share/dpkg/ or include /usr/share/dpkg/

  4. If none of the above options are good (you should have a very good reason) then package maintainers may set and export this variable manually in debian/rules:

     export SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH ?= $(shell dpkg-parsechangelog -STimestamp)
    If you need/want to support dpkg versions earlier than 1.18.8:
     export SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH ?= $(shell dpkg-parsechangelog -SDate | date -f- +%s)
    If you need/want to support dpkg versions earlier than 1.17.0:
     export SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH ?= $(shell dpkg-parsechangelog | grep -Po '^Date: \K.*' | date -f- +%s)
    This snippet is believed to work on dpkg versions as far back as 2003.

Reading the variable

We are persuading upstream tools to support this directly. You may help by writing patches for these tools; please add links to the bug reports here so we know, and to act as an example resource for future patch writers.


gettext, qt4-x11 cmake upstream


Or search in all Debian sources:


import os
import time
import datetime

build_date = datetime.datetime.utcfromtimestamp(int(os.environ.get('SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH', time.time())))

Bash / POSIX shell

For GNU systems:

BUILD_DATE="$(date --utc --date="@${SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH:-$(date +%s)}" +%Y-%m-%d)"

If you need to also support BSD date as well:

BUILD_DATE=$(date -u -d "@$SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH" "+$DATE_FMT" 2>/dev/null || date -u -r "$SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH" "+$DATE_FMT" 2>/dev/null || date -u "+$DATE_FMT")


use POSIX qw(strftime);
my $date = strftime("%Y-%m-%d", gmtime($ENV{SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH} || time));


DATE_FMT = %Y-%m-%d
    BUILD_DATE ?= $(shell date -u -d "@$(SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH)" "+$(DATE_FMT)"  2>/dev/null || date -u -r "$(SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH)" "+$(DATE_FMT)" 2>/dev/null || date -u "+$(DATE_FMT)")
    BUILD_DATE ?= $(shell date "+$(DATE_FMT)")

The above will work with either GNU or BSD date, and fallback to ignore SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH if both fails.



or on unpatched cmake

    COMMAND "date" "-u" "-d" "@$ENV{SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH}" "+%Y-%m-%d"
else ()
    COMMAND "date" "+%Y-%m-%d"
endif ()

The above will work only with GNU date. See POSIX shell example on how to support BSD date.


#include <errno.h>
#include <limits.h>

struct tm *build_time;
time_t now;
char *source_date_epoch;
unsigned long long epoch;
char *endptr;

source_date_epoch = getenv("SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH");
if (source_date_epoch) {
        errno = 0;
        epoch = strtoull(source_date_epoch, &endptr, 10);
        if ((errno == ERANGE && (epoch == ULLONG_MAX || epoch == 0))
                        || (errno != 0 && epoch == 0)) {
                fprintf(stderr, "Environment variable $SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH: strtoull: %s\n", strerror(errno));
        if (endptr == source_date_epoch) {
                fprintf(stderr, "Environment variable $SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH: No digits were found: %s\n", endptr);
        if (*endptr != '\0') {
                fprintf(stderr, "Environment variable $SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH: Trailing garbage: %s\n", endptr);
        if (epoch > ULONG_MAX) {
                fprintf(stderr, "Environment variable $SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH: value must be smaller than or equal to %lu but was found to be: %llu \n", ULONG_MAX, epoch);
        now = epoch;
} else {
        now = time(NULL);
build_time = gmtime(&now);


#include <sstream>
#include <iostream>
#include <cstdlib>
#include <ctime>

  time_t now;
  char *source_date_epoch = std::getenv("SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH");
  if (source_date_epoch) {
    std::istringstream iss(source_date_epoch);
    iss >> now;
    if ( || !iss.eof()) {
      std::cerr << "Error: Cannot parse SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH as integer\n";
  } else {
    now = std::time(NULL);


import (


source_date_epoch := os.Getenv("SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH")
var build_date string
if source_date_epoch == "" {
        build_date = time.Now().UTC().Format(http.TimeFormat)
} else {
        sde, err := strconv.ParseInt(source_date_epoch, 10, 64)
        if err != nil {
                panic(fmt.Sprintf("Invalid SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH: %s", err))
        build_date = time.Unix(sde, 0).UTC().Format(http.TimeFormat)

git repository

to set SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH to the last modification of a git repository, in shell:

SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=$(git log -1 --pretty=%ct)


date('Y', getenv('SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH') ?: time())


  (when (getenv "SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH")
        (getenv "SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH"))))))

Javascript / node.js

var timestamp = new Date(process.env.SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH ? (process.env.SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH * 1000) : new Date().getTime());


  now =
  now =['SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH'].to_i).gmtime

Note that Ruby's Datetime.strftime is locale-independent by default.

Last-resort using faketime

As a last resort to be avoided where possible (e.g. if the upstream tool is too hard to patch, or too time-consuming for you right now to patch, or if they are being uncooperative or unresponsive), package maintainers may try something like the following:


# Depends: faketime
# Eventually the upstream tool should support SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH internally.
test -n "$SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH" || { echo >&2 "$0: SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH not set"; exit 255; }
exec env NO_FAKE_STAT=1 faketime -f "$(TZ=UTC date -d "@$SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH" +'%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S')" /usr/bin/a2x "$@"


export PATH := $(CURDIR)/debian/strip-nondeterminism:$(PATH)


Build-Depends: faketime

But please be aware that this does not work out of the box with pbuilder on Debian 7 Wheezy, see #778462 against faketime and #700591 against pbuilder (fixed in Jessie, but not Wheezy). Adding an according hook to /etc/pbuilder/hook.d which mounts /run/shm inside the chroot should suffice as local workaround, though.

TODO: document some other nicer options. Generally, all invocations of date(1) need to have a fixed TZ environment set.

NOTE: faketime BREAKS builds on some archs, for example hurd. See #778462 for details.

More detailed discussion

Sometimes developers of build tools do not want to support SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH, or they will tweak the suggestion to something related but different. We really do think the best approach is to use SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH exactly as-is described above in our proposal, without any variation. Here we explain our reasoning versus the arguments we have encountered.

(See Standard Environment Variables for general arguments.)

"Lying about the time" / "violates language spec"

This argument arises when the tool processes some input which contains a static instruction to the effect of "get_current_time()". The input has a specification that defines what this means. The tool executes this instruction, then embeds the result in the output. It is argued that SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH would break these semantics and violate the specification.

In most cases, this argument places too much weight on the absoluteness of time. Regardless of what any specification says, the user can set their own system clock and achieve an effect similar to SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH. 1 It is not up to the tool to judge whether the user is lying with their system clock, and likewise, it is not up to the tool to judge whether SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH is a "lie" or not.

For all intents and purposes, if the user has set SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH then they are taking a position that "this is the current time; please use this instead of whatever clock you normally use". Yes, the project developer wrote "get_current_time()" but I as the user, by setting SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH, am choosing to override this with my own idea of what time it is. Please execute the build as if the current time was SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH. FOSS software should generally prefer to respect end-users' wishes rather than developers' wishes. (And in practise, we haven't seen any instance where a project developer really really prefers "time of build" over "modtime of source".)

In conclusion, the tool may choose to ignore SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH for other reasons, but to judge that this is a lie is to disrespect the user's wishes. Furthermore, choosing to support this is unlikely to actually violate any specifications, since they generally don't define "current". 2

Many tools allow the user to override the "current" date - e.g. -D__TIME__=xxx, \\year=yyy, etc. In these cases, it makes even less sense to ignore SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH for data integrity reasons - you already have a mechanism where the user can "lie" or "break the spec"; SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH would just be adding an extra mechanism that makes it easier to do this globally across all tools.

If for some reason you're still conflicted on suddenly changing the meaning of your "now()" function and desire another switch other than SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH being set or not, the texlive project came up with the variable FORCE_SOURCE_DATE; when that environment variable is set to 1 cases that wouldn't normally obey SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH will do. We strongly discourage the usage of such variable; SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH is meant to be already a flag forcing a particular timestamp to be used.

OTOH, one alternative we can agree with, that also avoids SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH, would be to translate the static instruction "get_current_time()" from the input format to an equivalent instruction in the output format, if the output format supports that.

History and alternative proposals

1 and the surrounding messages describe the initial motivation behind this, including an evaluation of how different programming languages handle date formats.

At present, we do not have a proposal that includes anything resembling a "time zone". Developing such a standard requires consideration of various issues:

Intuitive and naive ways of handling human-readable dates, such as the POSIX date functions, are highly flawed and freely mix implicit not-well-defined calendars with absolute time. For example, they don't specify they mean the Gregorian calendar, and/or don't specify what to do with dates before when the Gregorian calendar was introduced, or use named time zones that require an up-to-date timezone database (e.g. with historical DST definitions) to parse properly.

Since this is meant to be a universal standard that all tools and distributions can support, we need to keep things simple and precise, so that different groups of people cannot accidentally interpret it in different ways. So it is probably unwise to try to standardise anything that resembles a named time zone, since that is very very complex.

One likely candidate would be something similar to the git internal timestamp format, see man git-commit:

We already have SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH so the time zone offset could be placed in SOURCE_DATE_TZOFFSET or something like that. But all of this needs further discussion.

Other non-standard variables that we haven't yet agreed upon, use at your own risk:

export SOURCE_DATE_TZOFFSET = $(shell dpkg-parsechangelog -SDate | tail -c6)
export SOURCE_DATE_RFC2822 = $(shell dpkg-parsechangelog -SDate)
export SOURCE_DATE_ISO8601 = $(shell python -c 'import time,email.utils,sys;t=email.utils.parsedate_tz(sys.argv[1]);\
print(time.strftime("%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S",t[:-1])+"{0:+03d}{1:02d}".format(t[-1]/3600,t[-1]/60%60));' "$(SOURCE_DATE_RFC2822)")

The ISO8601 code snippet is complex, in order to preserve the same timezone offset as in the RFC2822 form. If one is OK with stripping out this offset, i.e. forcing to UTC, then one can just use date -u instead. However, this then contains the same information as the unix timestamp, but the latter is generally easier to work with in nearly all programming languages.


  1. Setting the system clock is not enough for reliable reproducible builds - we need SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH for long-running build processes that take varying amounts of time. If the tool was run near the end of the process, then merely setting the system clock would not make timestamps here reproducible. (1)

  2. This does not take into account, if the specification needs to interoperate consistently with other programs in a strong cryptographic ledger protocol where time values must be consistent across multiple entities. However this scenario is unlikely to apply, in the context of build tools where SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH would be set. (2)