Differences between revisions 41 and 42
Revision 41 as of 2017-11-11 14:16:40
Size: 4843
Editor: ?ArnoutEngelen
Comment:
Revision 42 as of 2017-11-20 15:16:12
Size: 4917
Editor: ?ArnoutEngelen
Comment: Add attribution/copyright to logo proposal #17
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 139: Line 139:
by Arnout Engelen, feel free to use under the terms of the CC0 license

It would be great to have logo, to be able to print tshirts and do other things with it.

This page should collect proposals, until we find a good one. Where good means: is a good logo (can be resized, works in one color, etc - search the web for "good logo design" and read a few of the many results) and conveys the idea of the project (eg. should visualize/represent: "one source, several builds, several identical results", but other ideas/messages are certainly possible…).

Also, we actually need to two Logos: one for Reproducible Builds and one for Debian Reproducible Builds, which should probably be the logo plus the swirl :)

ideas / concepts

#1

Taken from slides from Hans-Christoph Steiner's talk about FDrdoid at FOSDEM 16:

idea #1

#2

Using of a circle to represent a build that is reproduced:

idea #2a

Source: https://gist.github.com/h4ck3rm1k3/560a7e6084534f328c47f28b2935f58f

  • idea #2b

Source: https://gist.github.com/h4ck3rm1k3/f0150704541c87995656901ab1866267

  • idea #2c

Author: Mike ?DuPont

#3

  • a circle divided into 3N sectors (= pie chart), where each N consecutive sectors are the same color.
  • 1 color = 1 build
  • N sectors the same color = N builds the same output

Author: Daniel Shahaf

#4

idea #4

(Inspiration from https://s10.postimg.org/3qv3imvgp/hqdefault.jpg)

Author: Valessio Brito

#5

idea #5

Author: Valessio Brito

#6

idea #5

Author: Valessio Brito

#7

idea #7

Author: Chris Lamb

#8

idea #8

Author: Chris Lamb

#9

idea #8

From reddit request for logos https://www.reddit.com/r/freedesign/comments/59a80v/request_free_software_project_reproducible_builds/d9a3gvr/

Author: thefyrewire1

#10

A double helix.

Rationale: each strand of the double helix can be used to completely reproduce the other. Also, DNA is somewhat analogous to machine code.

See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:DNA_icon.svg (and the category) for a schema of a double helix. (In DNA, the yellow and green rods come in four kinds each, and each kind of green is always paired with the same kind of yellow.)

#11

DrawingHands.jpg

"drawing hands" -- nerdy M.C. Escher reference, reproducible builds build each other. I don't know how to make it into a proper logo, though.

Suggestion from dkg, hopefully more graphically-inclined people can make it better.

#12

idea #12

baking forms…

by Falko Oldenburg

#13

idea #13

by Falko Oldenburg

baking tetris form…

#14

idea #14

by Falko Oldenburg, who is always reminded of "rabbits" when hearing "reproduction"…

#15

idea #15

by Falko Oldenburg; Some more of that rabbit concept, now constructed from the initials…

#16

"R" and "B" difference by Bernhard M. Wiedemann: https://www.zq1.de/~bernhard/images/rb/rb-diff2.png

#17

Inspired by #8, but all arrows pointing to the right, symbolizing that the same source can be built many times but all builds converge on the same result.

Needs some tweaking visually, but I think this idea can work with and without text, and both at high and low sizes/resolutions.

width=400

by Arnout Engelen, feel free to use under the terms of the CC0 license

TODO

  • link more existing proposals here
  • actually turn these ideas into actual logos, eg they should work without the text "reproducible builds"

comments


lamby: re: your logos: as said, #7 reminds me too much of the logos of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_Labour_Front and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strength_Through_Joy and then i dislike for #7+#8 that they both dont really work without the words reproducible builds". and then they both (to me) symbolize endlessly running in circles, and not many builds results in one result * h01ger likes the _ideas_ of #1, #10 and #11 but i dont consider them ready/suitable as logos _yet_ * h01ger dislikes #2, #4, #5 + #6 - i dont recognize anything in them