528
Comment: Created paged
|
← Revision 7 as of 2022-12-10 02:06:23 ⇥
923
page content is release recertification not archive qualification
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 1: | Line 1: |
## page was renamed from ArchiveQualification/Jessie | |
Line 14: | Line 15: |
DSA listed concerns for a number of architectures [[https://lists.debian.org/debian-superh/2013/06/msg00019.html|here]]. These should be reflected in the architecture qualification table. At the time of writing (2013-09-01), the following architectures had remaining concerns: armel, armhf, hurd-i386, mips, mipsel, s390, s390x and sparc. | DSA listed concerns for a number of architectures [[https://lists.debian.org/debian-superh/2013/06/msg00019.html|here]]. These should be reflected in the architecture qualification table. At the time of writing (2013-09-01), the following architectures had remaining concerns: * armel, armhf, hurd-i386, mips, mipsel, s390, s390x and sparc. -- NielsThykier <<DateTime(2013-09-01T08:20:49+0100)>> == Status of amd64 and i386 == No concerns at the moment. -- NielsThykier <<DateTime(2013-09-01T08:28:32+0100)>> == Status of <your port here> == Describe the state of your port. Please remember to sign it off with a signature e.g. by using @''''''SIG''''''@ |
Criteria
Policy
http://release.debian.org/jessie/arch_policy.html
"The table"
http://release.debian.org/jessie/arch_qualify.html
DSA concerns
DSA listed concerns for a number of architectures here. These should be reflected in the architecture qualification table. At the time of writing (2013-09-01), the following architectures had remaining concerns:
- armel, armhf, hurd-i386, mips, mipsel, s390, s390x and sparc.
-- NielsThykier 2013-09-01 07:20:49
Status of amd64 and i386
No concerns at the moment.
-- NielsThykier 2013-09-01 07:28:32
Status of <your port here>
Describe the state of your port.
Please remember to sign it off with a signature e.g. by using @SIG@