qemu: put apt installation and manual installation into two separate sections.
explain why a merged repository is needed
|Deletions are marked like this.||Additions are marked like this.|
|Line 295:||Line 295:|
|==== Creating a chroot with qemu-user-static, debootstrap and merged repository ====
There is a minimal repository essentially merging debian-ports
unstable+unreleased repositories, with enough packages to debootstrap
a minimal chroot.
|==== Creating a chroot with debootstrap and merged repository ====
There is a minimal repository merging debian-ports unstable+unreleased
repositories, with enough packages to debootstrap a minimal chroot, as
debootstrap is not able to install from multiple repositories, and
unstable alone doesn't yet contain all the packages needed for a
|Line 308:||Line 310:|
debootstrap --arch=riscv64 --variant=minbase --include=debian-ports-archive-keyring --keyring=/usr/share/keyrings/debian-keyring.gpg sid ROOT https://people.debian.org/~vagrant/debian-riscv64/
debootstrap --arch=riscv64 \
sid ROOT https://people.debian.org/~vagrant/debian-riscv64/
This page contains details about a port of Debian for the RISC-V architecture called riscv64.
- In a nutshell
- Upstream project / Architecture / Hardware
Debian port information
- Hardware baseline and ABI choice
- Cross compilation
- Package repositories
- buildd (build-daemon) information
- Status Log
In a nutshell
What is RISC-V?
From the Wikipedia entry for RISC-V:
RISC-V (pronounced "risk-five") is an open source instruction set architecture (ISA) based on established reduced instruction set computing (RISC) principles.
There are different versions of the instruction set for 32, 64 and 128 bits; operating as little-endian by default.
What is a Debian port?
In short, a port in Debian terminology means to provide the software normally available in the Debian archive (over 20,000 source packages) ready to install and run on systems based in a given computer architecture with the Linux kernel, or kernel-architecture combinations, with other kernels including GNU Mach (from GNU/Hurd) and kFreeBSD (from GNU/kFreeBSD).
What are the goals of this project in particular?
In this project the goal is to have Debian ready to install and run on systems implementing a variant of the RISC-V ISA:
Software-wise, this port will target the Linux kernel
Hardware-wise, the port will target the 64-bit variant, little-endian
This ISA variant is the "default flavour" recommended by the designers, and the one that seems to attract more interest for planned implementations that might become available in the next few years (development boards, possible consumer hardware or servers).
While 32-bit and 128-bit implementations are possible, there are problems with this:
- In the context of RISC-V design, they have not been explored as deeply, and tools and resources (e.g. simulators, research cores) as not as well studied and adapted;
- For general purpose computers, the focus shifted to 64-bit for many years already, and there isn't a lot of interest in 32-bit architectures except for specific purposes;
- 32-bit ports in Debian already struggle to compile some large packages of the archive in the last few months/years, a problem that will become worse with time;
- and 128 is simply not realistic at this time.
Percentage of packages that build on RISC-V (bottom right, grey line)
Upstream project / Architecture / Hardware
Upstream project / Community
Main website: https://riscv.org
Mailing lists (see below for Debian-specific): https://riscv.org/mailing-lists/
IRC (see below for Debian-specific): #riscv (general RISC-V discussions) and #linux-riscv (RISC-V Linux kernel development) at freenode
ASIC implementations, i.e. "real" CPU chips
At FOSDEM 2018, working production samples of the SiFive "Freedom U540" SoC (quad-core RV64GC) and a corresponding development board ("HiFive Unleashed") have been presented. As of February 2018, availability of a limited number of boards from the first production run is planned for March 2018; general availability is planned for end of June 2018.
For the future further RISC-V-based ASICs are expected, among them a SoC from the lowRISC project, which has described itself as follows:
"lowRISC is a not-for-profit organisation working closely with the University of Cambridge and the open-source community.
Toolchain upstreaming status
- binutils: upstreamed (2.28 is the first release with RISC-V support)
- gcc: upstreamed (7.1 is the first release with RISC-V support)
- glibc: upstreamed (2.27 is the first release with RISC-V support)
- linux kernel: upstreaming in progress (the architecture core code is in kernel 4.15; for full system support additional driver code is necessary which is planned to go into kernel 4.16/4.17)
- gdb: not upstreamed yet
qemu: merged upstream, targets the 2.12 release. For more information about qemu please refer to the qemu section below.
Debian port information
Hardware baseline and ABI choice
The Debian port uses RV64GC as the hardware baseline and the lp64d ABI (the default ABI for RV64G systems).
Making the C extension a part of the default hardware baseline for general-purpose binary Linux distributions has been agreed upon between Fedora porters, Debian porters and members of the RISC-V foundation. According to the chairman of the board of the RISC-V foundation, the foundation will provide "a profile for standard RISC-V Unix platforms that will include C as mandatory".
irc.oftc.net / irc.debian.org (https://www.oftc.net/)
#debian-bootstrap (general port bootstrap efforts)
- #lowRISC (not exactly Debian specific, but many interested people within Debian participate)
- riscv64: all bugs related to the Debian riscv64 port
To: email@example.com Subject: foo: FTBFS on riscv64 Package: foo Version: 1.2.3-4 X-Debbugs-CC: firstname.lastname@example.org User: email@example.com Usertags: riscv64 The version of the package currently FBTFS on the riscv64 port: URL_of_the_log
To: firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: riscv64 usertags for #BUGNUMBER CC: email@example.com user firstname.lastname@example.org usertag BUGNUMBER + riscv64 stop
To: BUGNUMBER@bugs.debian.org Subject: Setting riscv64 usertags CC: email@example.com Control: user firstname.lastname@example.org Control: usertag -1 + riscv64
Since 2018-03-23 both gcc-7-based as well as gcc-8-based cross-toolchains targeting riscv64 are available in unstable. These include glibc and related basic libraries for riscv64 in arch:all packages. As those packages use different library paths than the corresponding "native" (i.e. arch:riscv64) packages and don't include some of the configuration that is part of their "native" counterparts, making full use of them for building packages in a multiarch configuration requires the following steps:
$ sudo dpkg --add-architecture riscv64 $ sudo apt-get install gcc-riscv64-linux-gnu g++-riscv64-linux-gnu $ sudo cat >/etc/ld.so.conf.d/riscv64-linux-gnu.conf <<EOF /usr/local/lib/riscv64-linux-gnu /lib/riscv64-linux-gnu /usr/lib/riscv64-linux-gnu /usr/riscv64-linux-gnu/lib/ EOF $ sudo ln -s /usr/riscv64-linux-gnu/lib/ld-linux-riscv64-lp64d.so.1 /lib
Building a toolchain with rebootstrap
Another option of getting a Debian multiarch-capable cross-toolchain for riscv64 is to build one locally with rebootstrap:
$ sudo apt-get install pbuilder $ sudo pbuilder create --distribution unstable $ git clone https://anonscm.debian.org/git/users/helmutg/rebootstrap.git $ cd rebootstrap $ mkdir -p /tmp/repo && sudo pbuilder execute --bindmounts /tmp/repo bootstrap.sh HOST_ARCH=riscv64 REPODIR=/tmp/repo GCC_VER=7
As pbuilder works in a throwaway chroot and deletes it again after it has finished, it is important to bind-mount the directory into which the created packages are to be placed ("/tmp/repo" in the example above) from the host filesystem into the chroot, as otherwise the freshly built packages would be deleted again when pbuilder removes the throwaway chroot. This can be achieved by either passing a "--bindmounts" parameter to pbuilder as above or by adding a BINDMOUNTS entry to pbuilderrc.
Rebootstrap supports building gcc-7-based and gcc-8-based cross-toolchains; just set the "GCC_VER" parameter accordingly. After the build process has finished, you can find a repository with a cross-toolchain and a number of cross-built packages in /tmp/repo. Don't worry when rebootstrap stops the build process with an error - that is expected as rebootstrap tries to build further packages after the toolchain is ready and some of those don't yet properly cross-build for riscv64.
Please note that you have to delete the repository directory ("/tmp/repo" in the example above) if you want to re-run rebootstrap as rebootstrap currently doesn't properly handle a pre-filled repository directory.
Starting from 2018-03-09, upstream qemu git contains RISC-V support. In system-emulation mode, it implements a "virt" board that allows running upstream kernels with virtio block and network devices and a serial console, and a "spike"-compatible board.
893767 has been filed to enable riscv64 targets.
Installing with apt
A limited set of packages are available, including qemu-system-misc and qemu-user-static with riscv64 enabled, until the packaging is included in Debian:
deb [signed-by=/usr/share/keyrings/debian-keyring.gpg] https://people.debian.org/~vagrant/debian-riscv64 UNRELEASED main
The repository is signed by vagrant, key available in the debian-keyring package.
The Linux kernel has a very useful "binfmt-misc" feature that allows to transparently run foreign-architecture user-mode binaries with qemu. Debian supports this out-of-the-box for the release architectures with the qemu-user-static package; riscv64-support can be added as follows:
Build a static qemu binary with support for user-mode emulation:
$ git clone https://git.qemu.org/git/qemu.git $ cd qemu $ ./configure --static --disable-system --target-list=riscv64-linux-user $ make $ sudo cp riscv64-linux-user/qemu-riscv64 /usr/bin/qemu-riscv64-static
Create a binfmt-support config file and register it:
$ cat >/tmp/qemu-riscv64 <<EOF package qemu-user-static type magic offset 0 magic \x7f\x45\x4c\x46\x02\x01\x01\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x02\x00\xf3\x00 mask \xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\x00\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xfe\xff\xff\xff interpreter /usr/bin/qemu-riscv64-static EOF $ sudo update-binfmts --import /tmp/qemu-riscv64
With this it is now possibe to transparantly run user-mode riscv64 binaries on another architecture:
$ uname -m x86_64 $ file busybox busybox: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, UCB RISC-V, version 1 (SYSV), statically linked, for GNU/Linux 3.0.0, stripped $ ./busybox touch foo $ ls foo foo
This also works in chroots if the /usr/bin/qemu-riscv64-static binary is available inside the chroot.
For the use of qemu in the bootstrap process of other ports, please see
The Debian-Ports repository is now the main package repository for the Debian riscv64 port - unless there are special circumstances, this is the repository that should be used as the base for further work on the port. A basic set of riscv64 packages has been imported into Debian-Ports on the weekend of 2018-03-24/25 and there are autobuilders running to keep the repository up-to-date.
For accessing the Debian-Ports repository, please follow the instructions at https://www.ports.debian.org/archive. Example /etc/apt/sources.list:
deb http://ftp.ports.debian.org/debian-ports/ sid main deb http://ftp.ports.debian.org/debian-ports/ unreleased main deb-src http://ftp.ports.debian.org/debian-ports/ sid main
Mirrors are available (please use them if possible): https://www.ports.debian.org/mirrors
Creating a riscv64 chroot from the Debian-Ports repository
Currently there are still a number of RISC-V-specific patches for essential packages that are only available in the "unreleased" suite, but not in the "unstable" suite. This poses a problem when trying to use debootstrap to build a riscv64 chroot due to the fact that debootstrap can only use one single suite as its package source. For the time being, the easiest way to create a very bare-bones riscv64 chroot is the use of multistrap. In comparison to debootstrap, multistrap has the limitations of only working on Debian systems while debootstrap is designed to be distribution-agnostic, and several of the configuration options that debootstrap provides don't have a direct equivalent in multistrap.
To build a bare-bones riscv64 chroot on a Debian/unstable system of a different architecture, perform the following steps:
$ sudo apt-get install multistrap debian-ports-archive-keyring $ cat >/tmp/multistrap-riscv64.conf <<EOF [General] arch=riscv64 aptsources=Unstable Unreleased Sid-main bootstrap=Unstable Unreleased Sid-main [Sid-main] source=http://deb.debian.org/debian suite=unstable omitdebsrc=true keyring=debian-archive-keyring [Unstable] source=http://deb.debian.org/debian-ports suite=unstable omitdebsrc=true keyring=debian-ports-archive-keyring [Unreleased] source=http://deb.debian.org/debian-ports suite=unreleased omitdebsrc=true EOF $ sudo multistrap -d /tmp/riscv64-chroot -f /tmp/multistrap-riscv64.conf
This provides a (very bare-bones) riscv64 chroot in /tmp/riscv64-chroot. Performing these steps on a Debian/stable system requires installing the debian-ports-archive-keyring package from unstable beforehand.
Creating a chroot with debootstrap and merged repository
There is a minimal repository merging debian-ports unstable+unreleased repositories, with enough packages to debootstrap a minimal chroot, as debootstrap is not able to install from multiple repositories, and unstable alone doesn't yet contain all the packages needed for a successful debootstrap.
For this to work, you'll need to install debootstrap and the debian-keyring package.
For cross-architecture install, you'll also need qemu-user-static 2.12~rc2 or newer (see previously mentioned qemu apt repository if not yet available in Debian).
debootstrap --arch=riscv64 \ --include=debian-ports-archive-keyring \ --keyring=/usr/share/keyrings/debian-keyring.gpg \ sid ROOT https://people.debian.org/~vagrant/debian-riscv64/
Once installed, you'll want to edit ROOT/etc/apt/sources.list* to use the standard unstable and unreleased repositories from debian-ports.
Cross-bootstrap repository, based on upstream gcc/glibc/kernel
A number of Debian packages that have been cross-built for riscv64 with a cross-toolchain based on upstream gcc/glibc/kernel are available in an apt repository. This repository is work-in-progress, incomplete and packages in it may well be broken - use at your own risk! It targets Debian developers working on riscv64 support and cross-bootstrappability issues in Debian and is neither suitable nor intended for use by end-users.
For more detailed information, please read the README.riscv64-bootstrap in the repository.
Historic repository, based on pre-upstream glibc/gcc/kernel
IMPORTANT NOTE: Due to ABI breaks during the kernel and glibc upstreaming process, the packages in this repository are ABI-incompatible with modern toolchains and modern kernels.
Unofficial repository (WIP, incomplete and probably not working for you at the moment): http://riscv.mit.edu/
To use it, in /etc/apt/sources.list:
deb [ arch=riscv64 signed-by=/usr/share/keyrings/debian-keyring.gpg ] http://riscv.mit.edu/debian unstable main deb-src [ signed-by=/usr/share/keyrings/debian-keyring.gpg ] http://riscv.mit.edu/debian unstable main
The repository is signed with the key from Manuel as Debian Developer, contained in the file /usr/share/keyrings/debian-keyring.gpg, which is part of the package debian-keyring (available from Debian and derivatives).
buildd (build-daemon) information
Contact: buildd maintainers <email@example.com>
Stats graph: https://buildd.debian.org/stats/?arch=riscv64
Stats overview: https://buildd.debian.org/stats/riscv64.txt
Currently there are no porterboxes available. Please refer to the qemu section for installing a riscv64 virtual machine locally.
Port added to debian-ports, the first automatic builds start to build packages after the initial seed of the minimal set.
The upstream qemu maintainers have accepted the RISC-V patchset.
The dpkg 1.18.25 update for stable that would (among other things) have made the riscv64 architecture known to dak - and thereby have allowed uploads of packages that mention riscv64 in their control file to the archive - has been rejected by the stable release managers. The rejection hasn't been because of the riscv64 support but because of other factors, but it means it will unfortunately still take some time before we will be able to upload a number of core packages (e.g. linux and glibc) with riscv64 support enabled to the main archive.
A pull request to include RISC-V support into upstream qemu has been sent.
Glibc 2.27 has been released with support for RV64. Support for RV32 hasn't been fully ready in time for the 2.27 release and will be added later on. A Debian package of glibc 2.27 has been uploaded to experimental.
Since version 18.104.22.168 dpkg includes support for the riscv64 architecture. Uploading of packages that reference riscv64 in their control file to the archive isn't yet possible though, as the Debian archive management software runs on Debian/stable and a corresponding stable update is still pending.
Version 4 of the qemu upstreaming patchset has been posted to the qemu-devel mailinglist.
- Support in glibc has been accepted and committed in the master branch, the release of glibc 2.27 should happen in the next few days.
- Linux 4.15 was released a few days ago as well, with support for the userspace ABI needed by glibc. Drivers for this arch will be left for future releases, but ABI was the most important part.
A first version of the qemu upstreaming patchset has been posted to the qemu-devel mailinglist.
A new version of the glibc upstreaming patchset which matches the kernel code in Linux 4.15rc3 has been posted to the libc-alpha list.
The pull request for the kernel has been accepted and the architecture-core patchset has been merged into the upstream kernel repository.
A pull request for inclusion of the RISC-V architecture-core patchset into kernel 4.15 has been sent to Linus Torvalds.
The RISC-V Linux kernel upstreaming patchset has been included into linux-next.
Version 9 of the kernel upstreaming patchset has been posted to LKML on 2017-09-26. As planned after v8, it has been split into an architecture-core and a driver patchset. The RISC-V architecture maintainer has a kernel.org account now, which is a prerequisite for getting the patches into linux-next, but the actual inclusion into linux-next is still pending as the linux-next maintainer has announced that updating the linux-next tree will be on hold during the whole of October 2017.
The kernel upstreaming patchset hasn't made it in into the kernel 4.14 merge window, so it now targets kernel 4.15. Version 8 of the patchset has been posted to LKML recently (note: the archive of the corresponding thread on lkml.org appears to be incomplete). While the patchset has received an overall positive review from kernel developer Arnd Bergmann, he and two other kernel developers have pointed out a few minor points that require some further discussion and probably some restructuring of the timer code. The plan for version 9 of the patchset is to address those issues and split the patchset into an architecture-core and a driver patchset. The architecture-core patchset can then hopefully be soon included in linux-next as a preparation for getting it merged during the kernel 4.15 merge window.
- The RISC-V upstream kernel patchset has gone through a number of review cycles, but hasn't made it into the kernel 4.13 merge window. Judging from the review comments, chances for an inclusion into kernel 4.14 look quite good, though. There are a number of open questions concering the RISC-V memory model, whose formal specification is still work-in-progress. The corresponding RISC-V foundation working group has announced that the formal memory model specification should be published in the near future (before end of 2017).
- The upstream glibc maintainers have made clear that they require the kernel port to be accepted (at least as part of linux-next, preferably as part of a Linux release candidate) before the glibc support can be accepted for upstream inclusion. As a result, the upcoming glibc 2.26 release won't have RISC-V support. The earliest upstream glibc version that could have RISC-V support will therefore be 2.27, which is planned to be released around 02/2018.
The first version of an upstreaming patchset for glibc has been posted to the upstream glibc development list (libc-alpha).
The first version of an upstreaming patchset for the Linux kernel has been posted to the upstream Linux kernel mailinglist.
Upstream GCC 7.1 has been released with RISC-V support.
Unofficial repository published (WIP, incomplete and probably not working for you at the moment): http://riscv.mit.edu/
More information about details and story in https://people.debian.org/~mafm/posts/2017/20170422_debian-gnulinux-port-for-risc-v-64-bit-riscv64/
- Upstream binutils 2.28 have been released with RISC-V support on 2017-03-02.
- The binutils support for RISC-V has been accepted upstream in November/December 2016 and will be part of binutils 2.28 (expected to be released in Q1/2017).
The GCC support for RISC-V has been accepted for upstream inclusion by the GCC Steering Committee but is still pending the final stages of the technical review as there have been a number of review comments that need to be addressed in a new version of the upstreaming patchset. There is reason for hoping that the RISC-V support could make it into the GCC 7 release, but this depends on how fast the review process can be finished.
- The preparations for this port started in private a while ago, but nothing has been made public so far and nothing useful yet for users and developers.
The main reason is the lack of official support for this architecture in fundamental pieces of the toolchain (binutils, gcc, glibc), the main OS kernel (linux) or even other software that might help with the port (e.g. qemu). All of the mentioned pieces have support in progress and are considered to submit for upstreaming, but nothing definitive has happened at the moment.
In particular, a recent message informed about some upcoming changes to the supervisor specifications (the ABI), which will affect binutils at least. Starting a Debian port without the ISA being settled is not very good, since the effort will need to be restarted from scratch.
- It is expected that this situation will change soon (within few months) and that progress on this port can be resumed.
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo (ManuelMontecelo)
- Karsten Merker
- Also using personal computers and regular Debian infrastructure
- Created page of the port in the wiki