Differences between revisions 76 and 77
Revision 76 as of 2009-03-16 03:30:10
Size: 16338
Editor: anonymous
Comment: converted to 1.6 markup
Revision 77 as of 2012-10-07 03:16:01
Size: 0
Editor: PaulWise
Comment: moved to the Debian website
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
## page was renamed from ProjectNews/Issues/Current
#language en
||<tablewidth="100%" tablestyle=""style="border: 0px hidden ;">~-[[DebianWiki/EditorGuide#translation|Translation(s)]]: none-~ ||<style="border: 0px hidden ; text-align: right;"> (!) [[/Discussion]] ||

##
## When editing this file, please keep the line length around 80
## characters, so diffs are easier to read. Thanks!
##

##
## Note: Please avoid using internal wiki links (like [:Foo/Bar/Baz:something],
## since we need to transform them to complete links when
## adding the news to the web-page anyway
##

##
## If you change the text of one of the default categories (the "opener",
## "Important Debian Security Advisories", "Work-needing packages", "New
## and noteworthy packages" and "Want to continue reading DPN?"
## the Please also change the template at ProjectNewsTemplate so future
## issues of the ProjectNews will have your improvements, too
##

##
## Please add your Name to the copyright holders below. We generate the
## "the following people have contributed" line based on that, and you
## want your glory, don't you?
##

##
## Copyright © 2008 Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
## Copyright © 2008 Joerg Jaspert
## Copyright © 2008 Ben Finney
## Copyright © 2008 Justin B. Rye
##
## Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
## modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
## met:
##
## * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
## notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
## * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
## notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
## documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
##
## THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS
## IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED
## TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A
## PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
## OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
## SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
## LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
## DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
## THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
## (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
## OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
##

THIS NEWS HAS BEEN [[http://www.debian.org/News/project/2008/14|RELEASED]]!

PLEASE DON'T EDIT IT. IF YOU FIND ERRORS PLEASE CORRECT THEM ON THE DEBIAN WEBSITE.


----
 Debian Project News

 http://www.debian.org/News/project/2008/14

 Debian Project News - November 3rd, 2008
----

Welcome to this year's 14th issue of DPN, the newsletter for the Debian
community. Topics covered in this issue include:
 * Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 updated
 * Debian membership
 * First Lenny Bug Sprint finished successfully
 * ... and much more.
## triple-weaselled ("Some of... include... and much more") is overdoing it


= Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 updated =

The Debian project is pleased to announce the fifth update of its stable distribution
Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 (codename "Etch"). This update mainly corrects security
problems in the stable release, along with a few adjustments to serious problems.
Those who frequently install updates from security.debian.org won't have to update many
packages and most updates from security.debian.org are included in this update.
New CD and DVD images containing updated packages are available at the regular locations.

## syntax unintelligible, trimmed to something true but information may have been lost
## also: never use respectively, it's a false friend

Upgrading to this revision online is usually done by pointing the aptitude (or apt-get)
package tool (see the sources.list(5) manual page) to one of Debian's many FTP or
HTTP mirrors. A comprehensive list of mirrors is available [[http://www.debian.org/mirror/list|online]].

More information is available in the [[http://www.debian.org/News/2008/20081023.en.html|press release]].


= Debian membership =

After talking to several of the groups involved, Joerg Jaspert
[[http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2008/10/msg00005.html|proposed]] changes in the way
Debian membership is handled. The motivation for these changes is to make it possible for people
who contribute to Debian without maintaining packages (such as translators or documentation writers)
to become members of the project. He later [[http://blog.ganneff.de/blog/2008/10/24/developer-status.html|wrote]]
some comments additional to his proposal. However, due to the scope of the envisioned changes, several developers
proposed to [[http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2008/10/msg00193.html|stop these changes until]]
they have been decided upon via a general resolution, while Peter Palfrader
[[http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2008/10/msg00266.html|asked]] to be allowed to continue trying to solve this problem.

## PP reference seems to be the wrong post (?)

Lars Wirzenius and others would like to see the whole
[[http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2008/10/msg00145.html|membership system rethought]], not only the process by which membership is granted. Lars proposed that membership must be periodically renewed, while
"People should be allowed to join Debian when there is reasonably widespread consensus that they
agree with the project's goals, are committed to working on those goals, and are trustworthy."

Martin Krafft [[http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2008/10/msg00061.html|argued]] that instead of introducing
different classes of membership, Debian should define different privileges and criteria for how to obtain
them. Since these privileges already exist, it would be easier to define the criteria instead of mapping the
privileges to classes.


= First Lenny Bug Sprint finished successfully =
To help clean up release critical bug reports, especially longstanding ones,
Josselin Mouette [[http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2008/10/msg00004.html|initiated]]
the first Bug Sprint. In this competition, Debian Developers and other interested people volunteered
to try to fix their assigned release-critical bugs in a five day period. The winners in this competition
would get cookies.

Josselin later added that 27 players [[http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2008/10/msg00636.html|joined]]
the bug sprint and posted [[http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2008/11/msg00046.html|the results]].
(He already sent a more detailed [[http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2008/10/msg00875.html|draft]] earlier).
All in all, he was very satisfied with the results. Stefano Zacchiroli
[[http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2008/10/msg00887.html|proposed]] repeating this kind of event.


= Firmware in Lenny and how to deal with DFSG-violating packages =

Ben Finney [[http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2008/10/msg00368.html|wondered]] about several release-critical
bugs getting the "lenny-ignore" tag, which specifies that these bugs are not considered release critical for the upcoming
release of Debian GNU/Linux 5.0 "Lenny". Release Manager Marc Brockschmidt
[[http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2008/10/msg00369.html|explained]] that "In all of the bugs I recently tagged,
the DFSG violation is usually a formal problem, something that other
distributions and upstream don't consider a problem at all. While fixing
these issues is and should be a goal of Debian, it's hardly something
that can be done in the last few weeks before releasing. The drawbacks
of delaying the release indefinitely for these bugs are much greater
than releasing with these minor DFSG violations."

In the following discussion, Robert Millan [[http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2008/10/msg00107.html|proposed]]
a general resolution on how to deal with packages violating the
[[http://www.debian.org/social_contract#guidelines|Debian Free Software Guidelines]]. In his proposal, packages having
a bug report open regarding their compliance with the Debian Free Software Guidelines for a certain amount of time
must be moved from the "main" section to the "non-free" section. In his response to Robert's initial
[[http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2008/10/msg00010.html|proposal]], Release Wizard Steve Langasek
[[http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2008/10/msg00128.html|argued]] that Debian has been following the road of incremental improvement. He notes that all bugs reported regarding non-free
firmware for older releases have been dealt with.

= State of NEW queue =

Aurelien Jarno [[http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2008/10/msg00071.html|wondered]] whether the NEW queue (where
uploaded source packages creating new binary packages are held back awaiting the check and approval of an ftp-master)
is currently being processed. Joerg Jaspert [[http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2008/10/msg00180.html|answered]] that
the NEW queue has indeed not been processed very often recently. He explained further that changes in the software used to process this queue give precedence to packages that only add new binary components, as distinct from packages that add completely new code to the archive.


= Changes to archive.debian.org =

Joerg Jaspert [[http://blog.ganneff.de/blog/2008/10/26/archiving-sarge-aka-oldstable.html|announced]] several
changes for archive.debian.org, the most important being that Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 "Sarge" has been moved
from the regular mirrors to archive.debian.org. [[http://lists.debian.org/debian-mirrors-announce/2008/11/msg00000.html|For the convenience of our mirror network]],
the deletion was being performed in several chunks, avoiding problems with mirrors refusing
to delete too many files at once. He later
[[http://blog.ganneff.de/blog/2008/11/02/archivedebianorg-old-bugs-and.html|highlighted]] that the
unofficial port of Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 "Sarge" to the AMD64 architecture has been moved there, too.

Other changes are the availability of binary packages for Debian GNU/Linux 1.2 "Rex", 1.1 "Buzz" and 0.93R6. An
archive for packages from [[http://www.debian.org/volatile/|volatile.debian.org]],
[[http://www.debian.org/security/|security.debian.org]] and [[http://www.backports.org|www.backports.org]] is now also available at archive.debian.org.

During work on this, old mail archives from 1995, which had been lost, were found again as well as old bug
reports ranging from bug #350 to #1750. These will soon be added back to the appropriate archives.

= BTS link in need of new maintainer =

Pierre Habouzit [[http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2008/10/msg00006.html|announced]] that
he won't be able to maintain and run the BTS link service any more. This service is used to track activity
in upstream bug tracking systems and update the corresponding bug reports in
Debian's BTS in a semi-automated way. Currently this service needs to be run manually. Don Armstrong,
one of the maintainers of Debian's BTS, [[http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2008/10/msg00860.html|highlighted]]
the importance of the bts-link service, but won't be able to maintain it himself. Christoph Berg
[[http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2008/10/msg00066.html|suggested]] maintainership under the mantle of Debian's Quality
Assurance group if someone would volunteer to act as the main responsible maintainer.


= Porting debian-installer to the DNS-323 =

Matt Palmer [[http://www.hezmatt.org/~mpalmer/blog/general/porting_d-i_to_the_dns_323.html|wrote]] about his
experience when porting debian-installer to the DNS-323 system. The DNS-323 system is a network storage device.
While porting the installer to this device, he took notes and wrote down detailed instructions on how to port the
Debian installer to new architectures.

## debian-installer is the Debian installer

= Miscellaneous news =

## If this section is all the "other news", there shouldn't be more news categories after it

Stefano Zacchiroli [[http://upsilon.cc/~zack/blog/posts/2008/11/debian_developer_portfolio/|started collecting]]
the different web services offering information about a specific Debian Maintainer (e.g.
[[http://bugs.debian.org/zack@debian.org|open bugs]],
[[http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/todo.html?maint=zack@debian.org|debtags]], or
[[http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=zack@debian.org|an overview of their packages]])
on a dedicated [[http://wiki.debian.org/DDPortfolio|Wiki page]].
He asked maintainers of similar web services to add their pages to the wiki.

Michael Banck wrote a [[http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html?start=38|report]] about
this year's booth at Systems, the second largest computer related exhibition and conference in Germany.

Sandro Tosi [[http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2008/10/msg00042.html|created]] a script to
group orphaned packages to ease their adoption by individuals or groups interested in specific
sets of packages.

= New developers =

Since the previous issue of the Debian Project News, 2 applicants have been
accepted as Debian Maintainers.

Please welcome Mehdi Dogguy and Olly Betts to our project!


= Important Debian Security Advisories =

Debian's Security Team recently released advisories for these packages (among others):
[[http://www.debian.org/security/2008/dsa-1655|linux-2.6.24]],
[[http://www.debian.org/security/2008/dsa-1656|cupsys]],
[[http://www.debian.org/security/2008/dsa-1657|qemu]],
[[http://www.debian.org/security/2008/das-1658|dbus]],
[[http://www.debian.org/security/2008/das-1660|clamav]] and
[[http://www.debian.org/security/2008/das-1661|openoffice.org]].
Please read them carefully and take the proper measures.

Please note that these are a selection of the more important security advisories of the last
two weeks. If you need to be kept up to date about security advisories
released by the Debian Security Team, please subscribe to the
[[http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/|security mailing list]] for announcements.


= New and noteworthy packages =

The following packages were added to the unstable Debian archive recently
([[http://packages.debian.org/unstable/main/newpkg|among others]]):

# Note: The list of packages is created by a separate script and added later

Debian Package of the Day featured the packages
[[http://debaday.debian.net/2008/11/02/synfig-the-free-software-alternative-for-2d-animation/|synfig]] (a free software alternative for 2D animation) and
[[http://debaday.debian.net/2008/10/26/rdiff-backup-easy-incremental-backups-from-the-command-line/|rdiff-backup]] (easy incremental backups from the command line).


= Work-needing packages =

Currently 498 packages are orphaned and 118 packages are up for adoption. Please take a look
at the [[http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2008/10/msg00609.html|recent]]
[[http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2008/10/msg00869.html|reports]] to see if there are packages
you are interested in or view the complete list of
[[http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/help_requested|packages which need your help]].


= Want to continue reading DPN? =

Please help us create this newsletter.
We still need more volunteer writers to watch the Debian community
and report about what is going on. Please see the
[[http://wiki.debian.org/ProjectNews/HowToContribute|contributing page]] to find out how to
help. We're looking forward to receiving your mail at
debian-publicity@lists.debian.org.

##
## Contributors! Please list yourself here!
##
## By the way: Neither the wml-Templates nor the text form of the mail support your name to be linked;
## so please don't add you name as link here (makes copy and paste easier ;)
X, Y and Z contributed to this issue of the Debian
Project News.


----
CategoryProjectNews