Differences between revisions 13 and 14
Revision 13 as of 2006-10-05 15:13:57
Size: 3666
Editor: ?FrankKuester
Comment:
Revision 14 as of 2008-05-02 17:56:00
Size: 3542
Editor: ?FrankKuester
Comment: there's a readme in the upstream sources about the license, which isn't installd
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 2: Line 2:
Line 6: Line 5:
Line 8: Line 6:
Line 10: Line 7:
Line 12: Line 8:
   sources; contacted upstream

 * bbm: no license statement at all, bug filed
  . sources; contacted upstream
Line 17: Line 10:
Line 19: Line 11:
Line 26: Line 17:
Line 38: Line 28:
Line 40: Line 29:
Line 42: Line 30:
Line 44: Line 31:
   has no license at all.
  . has no license at all.
Line 47: Line 33:
   size*.clo files have a correct LPPL notice, the others have none.
  
The author seems to be active on Wikipedia, tried to contact him
  . size*.clo files have a correct LPPL notice, the others have none. The author seems to be active on Wikipedia, tried to contact him
Line 51: Line 35:
   seminar, which has not been investigated yet. Filed bug against beamer.
  . seminar, which has not been investigated yet. Filed bug against beamer.
Line 54: Line 37:

  tex/latex/psnfss/8r.sty
  . tex/latex/psnfss/8r.sty
Line 58: Line 39:
Line 60: Line 40:
   listed affiliation => should be removed

 * jurabib: No license for the documentation,  
  . listed affiliation => should be removed
 * jurabib: No license for the documentation,
Line 65: Line 43:
Line 67: Line 44:

    ''''Modification advice''''

 
Permission is granted to modify the listings package as well as
lstdrvrs.dtx. You are not allowed to distribute a modified version of
the listings package or lstdrvrs.dtx unless you change the file names
and provide the original files. In any case it is better to contact
the address below; other users will welcome removed bugs, new
features, and additional programming languages.
  . ''''Modification advice''''
 Permission is granted to modify the listings package as well as lstdrvrs.dtx. You are not allowed to distribute a modified version of the listings package or lstdrvrs.dtx unless you change the file names and provide the original files. In any case it is better to contact the address below; other users will welcome removed bugs, new features, and additional programming languages.
Line 80: Line 49:
      explicitly stated that this license applies to the package.

     
contacted upstream
  . explicitly stated that this license applies to the package. contacted upstream
Line 85: Line 51:
Line 87: Line 52:

Packages in teTeX or TeXlive with problematic licenses

This is a list of problematic files or CTAN packages in tetex-base and tetex-src, initially taken from tetex-base's copyright file (copyright.header in the source package). Some things are not up-to-date - the extsizes stuff is already resolved, e.g.

Serious problems

  • euler: LPPL according changelog, but no indication in file.
  • adrconv: No license at all for the documentation
  • antp: PD according to catalogue, no statement in the files, no
    • sources; contacted upstream
  • cite: chapterbib.sty is missing a license statement in the header
  • Problematic files by Donald Arseneau:
    • chapterbib.sty: no license information
    • tabls.sty: no license information
    • import.sty: "this software is free of any restrictions"
    • relsize.sty: "public domain", nothing else
    • version.sty: no license information, not only by D.A.
    • selectp.sty: no license information
    Files only in TeXLive:
    • braket.sty "This is free, unencumbered, unsupported software."
    • conditionals.sty: No license information, not only by D.A.
    • excludeonly.sty: No license information, not only by D.A.
    • notoccite.sty: PD, but license statement could be clearer
    • placeins.tex: No license information
    • sansmath: PD, but could be clearer (what is PD?)
    • tabto.tex: No license information
    • titleref.sty: PD, spell out
    • underscore.sty: No license information
    • varwidth.sty: LPPL, but outdated "short version" included
  • citesort.sty: no license statement
  • index.doc: no license statement - probably unused
  • eepic: The style files are public domain, but all the documentation
    • has no license at all.
  • extsizes: extsizes.sty, extarticle.cls and extreport.cls, and the
    • size*.clo files have a correct LPPL notice, the others have none. The author seems to be active on Wikipedia, tried to contact him
  • beamericon*: no license statement. beamerexample-seminar: just like
    • seminar, which has not been investigated yet. Filed bug against beamer.
  • one file in the psnfss directory with unclear license:
    • tex/latex/psnfss/8r.sty
  • a4wide.sty: no license statement, obsolete, uses a4.sty, should be removed
  • bar.sty: no license statement except "don't modify", latex2.09, authors no longer at their
    • listed affiliation => should be removed

  • jurabib: No license for the documentation,

Less serious problems

  • listings: LPPL, plus:
    • 'Modification advice'

    Permission is granted to modify the listings package as well as lstdrvrs.dtx. You are not allowed to distribute a modified version of the listings package or lstdrvrs.dtx unless you change the file names and provide the original files. In any case it is better to contact the address below; other users will welcome removed bugs, new features, and additional programming languages.

This is more restrictive than LPPL 1.3 (6.a and 6.d.2). The title is advice...

  • ae: Just a formal problem, the GPL is included, but nowhere is it
    • explicitly stated that this license applies to the package. contacted upstream
  • antt: gust font license, unclear which files % contacted upstream
  • EC fonts: strange license wording, asked Karl Berry to contact Jörg Knappen, the author
  • anysize: public domain, no details (by TE)
  • aeguill: license of documentation unclear, sent mail to author
  • changebar.drv: Outdated file, unclear license, but probably the same as the new one which uses it; remove because it is obsolete.