Subversion repository at Alioth. [http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-lyx Browse]
[http://packages.qa.debian.org/lyx Package Overview]
[http://bugs.debian.org/src:lyx Bugs], [http://email@example.com with bts-link usertags] (see [:bts-link])
[http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-lyx-devel pkg-lyx-devel mailing list] [http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-lyx-devel/ Archives]
- Fix bugs in the BTS
- Send patches upstream. We should aim at having a minimal packaging, as much as possible should be sent upstream. Only Debian-specific and "packaging-specific" stuff should be kept.
- lyxclient-man-nonascii-char - should this go upstream?
- 05.configure.py_prog_prefer - not sure if upstream will accept this patch
Brought both up on the [http://marc.info/?l=lyx-devel&m=119558615822037&w=2 lyx-devel list]. --SvenHoexter
- Solve the rpath problem on amd64.
I wonder if this bug still exists. Needs to be tested. --PerOlofsson
Provide a backport of 1.5.2 for etch users? [http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-lyx-devel/2007-November/002165.html (discussion)]
Bugreports without further feedback
[http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=299778 #299778 Math panel icons are unclear] - This one had no further feedback from the reporter but I think it's fixed.
[http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=410282 #410282 hebrew letters in reveresed order in the tutorial] This one is the other half of [http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=439116 #439116]. No feedback to this one aswell. This one never got reported upstream?
no, I never forwarded it --PerOlofsson
[http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=179996 #179996 Hungarian translation menu foo] I hesitate to waste time with this one. a) Because it's very, very old b) because the email address of the reporter doesn't look like you can expect any feedback from it. Someone against closing it or willing to handle it? --SvenHoexter
[http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/LyXOnDebian Debian pkg Wiki site in the Lyx Wiki]