Differences between revisions 97 and 99 (spanning 2 versions)
Revision 97 as of 2008-11-11 08:01:54
Size: 2619
Editor: SvenHoexter
Comment: lyx.1 fix commited upstream
Revision 99 as of 2009-03-16 03:30:18
Size: 2270
Editor: anonymous
Comment: converted to 1.6 markup
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 3: Line 3:
 * Subversion repository at Alioth. [http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/pkg-lyx Browse]
 * [http://packages.qa.debian.org/lyx Package Overview]
 * [http://bugs.debian.org/src:lyx Bugs], [http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=lyx&users=bts-link-upstream@lists.alioth.debian.org with bts-link usertags] (see [:bts-link])
 * [http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-lyx-devel pkg-lyx-devel mailing list] [http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-lyx-devel/ Archives]
 * Subversion repository at Alioth. [[http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/pkg-lyx|Browse]]
 * [[http://packages.qa.debian.org/lyx|Package Overview]]
 * [[http://bugs.debian.org/src:lyx|Bugs]], [[http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=lyx&users=bts-link-upstream@lists.alioth.debian.org|with bts-link usertags]] (see [[bts-link]])
 * [[http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-lyx-devel|pkg-lyx-devel mailing list]] [[http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-lyx-devel/|Archives]]
Line 10: Line 10:
  * prefer-xdg-open - Will be Debian specific until all other issue with xdg-open are solved. [http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg133878.html Discussion on lyx-devel.]   * prefer-xdg-open - Will be Debian specific until all other issue with xdg-open are solved. [[http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg133878.html|Discussion on lyx-devel.]]
Line 13: Line 13:
   * It does. See [http://groups.google.com/group/linux.debian.devel/browse_thread/thread/e58bfe4c2fd342cd?hl=en thread on debian-devel]. --PerOlofsson    * It does. See [[http://groups.google.com/group/linux.debian.devel/browse_thread/thread/e58bfe4c2fd342cd?hl=en|thread on debian-devel]]. --PerOlofsson
Line 16: Line 16:
 * Provide a backport? [http://emiscabpo.wordpress.com/ Emilio] has one in his repository.
 * The bash_completion file can eventually be integrated upstream. [http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4753 LyX Bugzilla] [http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg139940.html lyx-devel]
 * Review and maybe redecide the priority for texlive-latex-extra and other packages from texlive-extra.
 * Provide a backport? [[http://emiscabpo.wordpress.com/|Emilio]] has one in his repository.
 * The bash_completion file can eventually be integrated upstream. [[http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4753|LyX Bugzilla]] [[http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg139940.html|lyx-devel]]
Line 21: Line 20:
== Issue forwarded to lyx-devel ==
 * [http://marc.info/?l=lyx-devel&m=122625674822056&w=2 Empty images/commands directory created by make install.]
 * [http://marc.info/?l=lyx-devel&m=122625876224722&w=2 lyx.1 manpage .Sp warning] (fixed for 1.5.7 and 1.6.1 upstream)
Line 26: Line 22:
 * [http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/LyXOnDebian Debian page in the LyX wiki]
 * [http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/devel/lyx/ LyX packaging for Fedora]
 * [http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-office/lyx/ LyX packaging for Gentoo]
 * [[http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/LyXOnDebian|Debian page in the LyX wiki]]
 * [[http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/devel/lyx/|LyX packaging for Fedora]]
 * [[http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-office/lyx/|LyX packaging for Gentoo]]

LyX is collaboratively maintained in the pkg-lyx Alioth project. It is currently maintained by PerOlofsson and SvenHoexter.

TODO

  • Send patches upstream. We should aim at having a minimal packaging, as much as possible should be sent upstream. Only Debian-specific and "packaging-specific" stuff should be kept.
  • Solve the rpath problem on amd64.
    • I wonder if this bug still exists. Needs to be tested. --PerOlofsson

    • It does. See thread on debian-devel. --PerOlofsson

    • We should probably ask upstream to libtoolize with a newer libtool. But I'm not sure which version is needed - is it perhaps only fixed in Debian?
    • Seems to be only fixed in Debian. http://wiki.debian.org/RpathIssue I need to get my hands on a amd64 installation to try out which of the outlined solutions could work best for LyX. --SvenHoexter

  • Provide a backport? Emilio has one in his repository.

  • The bash_completion file can eventually be integrated upstream. LyX Bugzilla lyx-devel

  • Cleanup the Replaces and Conflicts at some point.