2619
Comment: lyx.1 fix commited upstream
|
← Revision 166 as of 2018-02-04 22:47:38 ⇥
2148
Remove obsolete mailing list
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 1: | Line 1: |
LyX is collaboratively maintained in the pkg-lyx Alioth project. It is currently maintained by PerOlofsson and SvenHoexter. | LyX is collaboratively maintained on salsa.debian.org. It's currently maintained with the git-buildpackage toolchain in conjunction with pristine-tar and tarball imports, thus still disconnected from the upstream git repository. |
Line 3: | Line 5: |
* Subversion repository at Alioth. [http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/pkg-lyx Browse] * [http://packages.qa.debian.org/lyx Package Overview] * [http://bugs.debian.org/src:lyx Bugs], [http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=lyx&users=bts-link-upstream@lists.alioth.debian.org with bts-link usertags] (see [:bts-link]) * [http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-lyx-devel pkg-lyx-devel mailing list] [http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-lyx-devel/ Archives] |
* Git repository [[https://salsa.debian.org/debian/lyx|Browse]] * [[https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/lyx|Package Overview]] * [[DebianBug:src:lyx|Bugs]], [[http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=lyx&users=bts-link-upstream@lists.alioth.debian.org|with bts-link usertags]] (see [[Glossary#bts-link|bts-link]]) |
Line 9: | Line 10: |
* Remove ttf-lyx transitional package. -> removed in git/master * Requires bug filling for remaining reverse dependencies. * Reassign all open bugs from ttf-lyx to fonts-lyx. * forward spelling patches to upstream and produce more of them - started with http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/10678 - closed, should be better with 2.3.x on-wards |
|
Line 10: | Line 15: |
* prefer-xdg-open - Will be Debian specific until all other issue with xdg-open are solved. [http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg133878.html Discussion on lyx-devel.] * Solve the rpath problem on amd64. * I wonder if this bug still exists. Needs to be tested. --PerOlofsson * It does. See [http://groups.google.com/group/linux.debian.devel/browse_thread/thread/e58bfe4c2fd342cd?hl=en thread on debian-devel]. --PerOlofsson * We should probably ask upstream to libtoolize with a newer libtool. But I'm not sure which version is needed - is it perhaps only fixed in Debian? * Seems to be only fixed in Debian. http://wiki.debian.org/RpathIssue I need to get my hands on a amd64 installation to try out which of the outlined solutions could work best for LyX. --SvenHoexter * Provide a backport? [http://emiscabpo.wordpress.com/ Emilio] has one in his repository. * The bash_completion file can eventually be integrated upstream. [http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4753 LyX Bugzilla] [http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg139940.html lyx-devel] * Review and maybe redecide the priority for texlive-latex-extra and other packages from texlive-extra. * Cleanup the Replaces and Conflicts at some point. |
* prefer-xdg-open - Will be Debian specific until all other issue with xdg-open are solved. [[http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg133878.html|Discussion on lyx-devel.]] sensible-editor has problems too, see [[http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7448|#7448]]. |
Line 21: | Line 17: |
== Issue forwarded to lyx-devel == * [http://marc.info/?l=lyx-devel&m=122625674822056&w=2 Empty images/commands directory created by make install.] * [http://marc.info/?l=lyx-devel&m=122625876224722&w=2 lyx.1 manpage .Sp warning] (fixed for 1.5.7 and 1.6.1 upstream) |
== general notes == * Since at least 2.1.0 there is a build dependency on bc to compare Qt versions, see also: * http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/137498 * http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-lyx-devel/2014-September/006379.html * Lintian warning: "I: lyx: spelling-error-in-binary usr/bin/lyx collapsable collapsible" - got forwarded by SvenHoexter some time ago to upstream, but was declined by a general disagreement about the correct spelling depending on country you're in. |
Line 26: | Line 24: |
* [http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/LyXOnDebian Debian page in the LyX wiki] * [http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/devel/lyx/ LyX packaging for Fedora] * [http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-office/lyx/ LyX packaging for Gentoo] |
* [[http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/LyXOnDebian|Debian page in the LyX wiki]] * [[https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/lyx|LyX packaging for Fedora]] * [[https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/app-office/lyx|LyX packaging for Gentoo]] |
LyX is collaboratively maintained on salsa.debian.org. It's currently maintained with the git-buildpackage toolchain in conjunction with pristine-tar and tarball imports, thus still disconnected from the upstream git repository.
Git repository Browse
Bugs, with bts-link usertags (see bts-link)
TODO
Remove ttf-lyx transitional package. -> removed in git/master
- Requires bug filling for remaining reverse dependencies.
- Reassign all open bugs from ttf-lyx to fonts-lyx.
forward spelling patches to upstream and produce more of them - started with http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/10678 - closed, should be better with 2.3.x on-wards
- Send patches upstream. We should aim at having a minimal packaging, as much as possible should be sent upstream. Only Debian-specific and "packaging-specific" stuff should be kept.
prefer-xdg-open - Will be Debian specific until all other issue with xdg-open are solved. Discussion on lyx-devel. sensible-editor has problems too, see #7448.
general notes
- Since at least 2.1.0 there is a build dependency on bc to compare Qt versions, see also:
Lintian warning: "I: lyx: spelling-error-in-binary usr/bin/lyx collapsable collapsible" - got forwarded by SvenHoexter some time ago to upstream, but was declined by a general disagreement about the correct spelling depending on country you're in.