|
Size: 2269
Comment: Added a reminder to reintroduce the xdg-open changes to configure.py
|
Size: 2084
Comment: The usuall updates to match the current state
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 10: | Line 10: |
| * Send patches upstream. We should aim at having a minimal packaging, as much as possible should be sent upstream. Only Debian-specific and "packaging-specific" stuff should be kept. * prefer-xdg-open - Will be Debian specific until all other issue with xdg-open are solved. [http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg133878.html Discussion on lyx-devel.] |
|
| Line 14: | Line 16: |
| * Provide a backport of 1.5.2 for etch users? [http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-lyx-devel/2007-November/002165.html (discussion)] * Reintroduce a patch to configure.py to prefer xdg-open where possible with LyX 1.5.4. === Done === * Send patches upstream. We should aim at having a minimal packaging, as much as possible should be sent upstream. Only Debian-specific and "packaging-specific" stuff should be kept. * Try dh_builddeb -- -Z bzip2 and check if we get some reasonable benefits in the package size. || package || gzip || bzip2 || || lyx 1.5.3/i386 || 3064 || 2724 || || lyx-common 1.5.3/i386 || 5460 || 4272 || |
* Provide a backport? [http://emiscabpo.wordpress.com/ Emilio] has one in his repository. |
LyX is collaboratively maintained in the pkg-lyx Alioth project. It is currently maintained by PerOlofsson and SvenHoexter.
Subversion repository at Alioth. [http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/pkg-lyx Browse]
[http://packages.qa.debian.org/lyx Package Overview]
[http://bugs.debian.org/src:lyx Bugs], [http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=lyx&users=bts-link-upstream@lists.alioth.debian.org with bts-link usertags] (see [:bts-link])
[http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-lyx-devel pkg-lyx-devel mailing list] [http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-lyx-devel/ Archives]
TODO
- Handle the remaining 5 bugs in the BTS
- Send patches upstream. We should aim at having a minimal packaging, as much as possible should be sent upstream. Only Debian-specific and "packaging-specific" stuff should be kept.
prefer-xdg-open - Will be Debian specific until all other issue with xdg-open are solved. [http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg133878.html Discussion on lyx-devel.]
- Solve the rpath problem on amd64.
I wonder if this bug still exists. Needs to be tested. --PerOlofsson
It does. See [http://groups.google.com/group/linux.debian.devel/browse_thread/thread/e58bfe4c2fd342cd?hl=en thread on debian-devel]. --PerOlofsson
- We should probably ask upstream to libtoolize with a newer libtool. But I'm not sure which version is needed - is it perhaps only fixed in Debian?
Provide a backport? [http://emiscabpo.wordpress.com/ Emilio] has one in his repository.
Bugreports without further feedback
[http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=440307 #440307 Difficult to select text and change figure text settings] Tagged unreproduceable and no further feedback from Gudjon. Feels a bit strange because he has been active and the report is a recent one. --SvenHoexter Note: According to Per there has been some private discussion but the bug only appeared on amd64 kernels.
Links
[http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/LyXOnDebian Debian pkg Wiki site in the Lyx Wiki]