Update to reflect the already commited changes for 1.5.3
add gzip vs. bzip2 package size
|Deletions are marked like this.||Additions are marked like this.|
|Line 16:||Line 16:|
| || package || gzip || bzip2 ||
|| lyx 1.5.3/i386 || 3064 || 2724 ||
|| lyx-common 1.5.3/i386 || 5460 || 4272 ||
Subversion repository at Alioth. [http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-lyx Browse]
[http://packages.qa.debian.org/lyx Package Overview]
[http://bugs.debian.org/src:lyx Bugs], [http://firstname.lastname@example.org with bts-link usertags] (see [:bts-link])
[http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-lyx-devel pkg-lyx-devel mailing list] [http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-lyx-devel/ Archives]
- Handle the remaining 5 bugs in the BTS
- Send patches upstream. We should aim at having a minimal packaging, as much as possible should be sent upstream. Only Debian-specific and "packaging-specific" stuff should be kept.
- Solve the rpath problem on amd64.
I wonder if this bug still exists. Needs to be tested. --PerOlofsson
Provide a backport of 1.5.2 for etch users? [http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-lyx-devel/2007-November/002165.html (discussion)]
- Try dh_builddeb -- -Z bzip2 and check if we get some reasonable benefits in the package size.
Bugreports without further feedback
[http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=440307 #440307 Difficult to select text and change figure text settings] Tagged unreproduceable and no further feedback from Gudjon. Feels a bit strange because he has been active and the report is a recent one. --SvenHoexter Note: According to Per there has been some private discussion but the bug only appeared on amd64 kernels.
[http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/LyXOnDebian Debian pkg Wiki site in the Lyx Wiki]