Differences between revisions 62 and 63
Revision 62 as of 2007-11-20 18:41:05
Size: 2099
Editor: PerOlofsson
Comment:
Revision 63 as of 2007-11-20 18:42:04
Size: 2142
Editor: PerOlofsson
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 22: Line 22:
 * no, I never forwarded it --PerOlofsson

LyX is collaboratively maintained in the pkg-lyx Alioth project. It is currently maintained by PerOlofsson and SvenHoexter.

TODO

  • Fix bugs in the BTS
  • Send patches upstream. We should aim at having a minimal packaging, as much as possible should be sent upstream. Only Debian-specific and "packaging-specific" stuff should be kept.
    • lyxclient-man-nonascii-char - should this go upstream?
    • 05.configure.py_prog_prefer - not sure if upstream will accept this patch
  • Solve the rpath problem on amd64.
  • Provide a backport of 1.5.2 for etch users? [http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-lyx-devel/2007-November/002165.html (discussion)]

Bugreports without further feedback

[http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=299778 #299778 Math panel icons are unclear] - This one had no further feedback from the reporter but I think it's fixed.

[http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=410282 #410282 hebrew letters in reveresed order in the tutorial] This one is the other half of [http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=439116 #439116]. No feedback to this one aswell. This one never got reported upstream?

[http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=179996 #179996 Hungarian translation menu foo] I hesitate to waste time with this one. a) Because it's very, very old b) because the email address of the reporter doesn't look like you can expect any feedback from it. Someone against closing it or willing to handle it? --SvenHoexter