Differences between revisions 8 and 9
Revision 8 as of 2007-11-26 23:25:56
Size: 3132
Editor: ?MarioDanic
Comment:
Revision 9 as of 2007-11-28 16:00:18
Size: 3525
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 35: Line 35:
''SebastianHeinlein''

How do you want to detect this situation? Using a timeout could be very problematic, especially if you run scrollkeeper in the postinst.
Line 50: Line 54:
''SebastianHeinlein''
How do you want to detect a license prompt? So there will be no way to confirm it either?
Line 69: Line 75:
''SebastianHeinlein'':

There is no corresponding support in dpkg to collect messages and ask them at the end.

Place new comments at the bottom

Add new comments, don't edit old ones

[:/..:Parent Page] > Discussion

Sign your comments using @SIG@

The purpose of this side is to coordinate the work on the apt backend for [http://www.packagekit.org PackageKit] and on porting the exisiting applications to PackageKit, mainly update-manager and gnome-app-install. PackageKit tries to make simple and common software management tasks easier and smoother among all/most distributions.

?TableOfContents(2)

Current State

We have got a very basic apt backend that currently allows to search (quite slow) and refresh/update the cache.

Code

Some packaging was already done:

https://code.launchpad.net/~packagekit/

Unsolved problems

Non-interactiveness of PackageKit

PackageKit only wants to support non-interactive software management tasks. But in some circumstances we need some user input. Especially if you we want to use PackageKit for update-manager we would target a huge variety of users and not only the "average home user".

@?MarioDanic@

- no question to the user - Error() if package requires user to respond - capture the stdout and pipe this to a Message() post transaction - dpkg silent mode

SebastianHeinlein

How do you want to detect this situation? Using a timeout could be very problematic, especially if you run scrollkeeper in the postinst.

Debconf

A Dbus viewer for debconf could pipe the questions to the user's desktop. Some packages cannot be installed without confirming a licence which will be displayed using debconf (flash and Sun java).

@?MarioDanic@

# Dbus viewer not needed #

Procedure: Throw an error of enum type "licence-prompt-required" or something like that and the daemon should do the right thing

Notes: The messages in the transactions have to be converted to abstract types and then can be shown using pk_backend_message() which then get passed up to the session and translated into locale

SebastianHeinlein How do you want to detect a license prompt? So there will be no way to confirm it either?

Stdin/out

Dpkg allows to read and write to the terminal in maintainer scripts. We would have to find a way to get the terminal through dbus too.

File replacement

Before replacing customizations to configuration files the user gets a prompt.

@?MarioDanic@

There will be work done NOT to overwrite configuration files by default, and show a Message() post transaction with all the details.

Message() types can be added as needed.

Note: message() is supported in recently released 0.1.4.

SebastianHeinlein:

There is no corresponding support in dpkg to collect messages and ask them at the end.

Non persistent backend dameon/cache

For each operation PackageKit creates a new instance of the backend. So we have to reopen the apt cache for each simple search or sate/description query. The solution could be [http://www.enricozini.org//2007/debtags/axi-searchasyoutype.html Enricos xapian database infrastructure] . We would need a hook in libapt to update the xapian cache on cache updates automatically.

@?MarioDanic@

In discussion with Michael about this.

Missing software meta information

Because of the different package naming schemas among all distributions there is no common reference to a certain software feature.