Differences between revisions 1 and 2
Revision 1 as of 2008-03-04 16:44:41
Size: 514
Editor: PaulLiu
Comment:
Revision 2 as of 2009-03-16 03:30:43
Size: 518
Editor: anonymous
Comment: converted to 1.6 markup
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 3: Line 3:
absence of an explicit grant of permission, therefore no right to even distribute ([http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2004/debian-vote-200401/msg01096.html discussion]); absence of an explicit grant of permission, therefore no right to even distribute ([[http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2004/debian-vote-200401/msg01096.html|discussion]]);
Line 5: Line 5:
[http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/debian-legal-200401/msg00215.html Author can't be contacted] [[http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/debian-legal-200401/msg00215.html|Author can't be contacted]]

Reason for being non-free: very simple license says it is "free software". fails to have an explicit clause allowing modification. clarification would be good, but IMO there is no compelling reason why this can't go in main.

absence of an explicit grant of permission, therefore no right to even distribute (discussion);

Author can't be contacted