[Show "Revision History"] [Show "General Page Infos"] [Show "Page hits and edits"]

Revision History

Showing page edit history entries from 1 to 104 out of 104 entries total.

# Date Size Editor Comment Action
104 2014-06-05 09:23:36 19677 to previous ?ansgar multiarch-support is no longer needed view
103 2013-02-13 21:08:41 20110 to previous ?SteveLangasek   view
102 2013-02-13 17:15:02 20133 to previous ?NikTh   view
101 2013-02-13 17:04:24 20070 to previous ?NikTh   view
100 2012-12-14 16:59:31 19935 to previous JonasSmedegaard Raise suggested backport-friendly debhelper compatibility level to 8: Satisfied in stable, and oldstable is no longer supported. view
99 2012-11-29 17:55:35 19935 to previous ?GregorHerrmann fix link view
98 2012-09-13 02:00:02 19943 to previous YunQiangSu   view
97 2012-05-29 03:08:34 19884 to previous ?SteveLangasek   view
96 2012-05-28 14:31:25 19884 to previous ?IvoDeDecker   view
95 2012-05-22 17:43:41 19732 to previous YaroslavHalchenko "not shared" -> "shared" : please review either change is what is meant to be said view
94 2012-05-19 04:54:48 19733 to previous ?SteveLangasek wordsmithing view
93 2012-05-19 04:41:36 19746 to previous ?SteveLangasek improve the dh-exec example: multiarch subst is done by default so don't make this longer than necessary; use a real case where you need dh-exec instead of a wildcard view
92 2012-05-19 04:35:26 19761 to previous ?SteveLangasek wordsmithing view
91 2012-05-19 04:33:53 19749 to previous ?SteveLangasek further wordsmithing view
90 2012-05-19 04:31:54 19677 to previous ?SteveLangasek wordsmith about autogenerated debhelper files, which are not actually "autogenerated" in the case of dh-exec view
89 2012-05-19 04:24:00 19043 to previous ?SteveLangasek wording is good view
88 2012-05-19 04:23:08 19035 to previous ?SteveLangasek drop more references to architecture.mk. make includes are evil. view
87 2012-05-19 04:12:51 19179 to previous ?SteveLangasek Backporting is not relevant for multiarch packages. But don't use dh-exec with 1.0 source packages, it's more to chmod the files than to do it in-line view
86 2012-05-19 04:02:27 19177 to previous ?SteveLangasek I correct myself: dh-exec calls dpkg-architecture directly to set $DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH, so no need to export from debian/rules. Not sure this is sane to rely on, but it does work. view
85 2012-05-19 02:50:55 19102 to previous ?SteveLangasek Make include files are evil. Do not recommend them, and do not give multiple options for the same task. view
84 2012-05-19 02:49:01 19213 to previous ?SteveLangasek Remove incorrect claim that you don't have to export DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH explicitly when using dh-exec. You certainly do. view
83 2012-05-19 02:17:32 19286 to previous ?SteveLangasek "Any which appear in build-dependencies" - this is inexact and superseded by recent apt changes. Drop this paragraph. view
82 2012-05-19 02:15:55 19650 to previous ?SteveLangasek since there's an explicit pointer to a different page for non-lib M-A: foreign packages, don't claim this page covers them view
81 2012-05-04 00:10:38 19847 to previous wookey   view
80 2012-05-03 23:53:53 19902 to previous wookey   view
79 2012-05-03 17:59:45 19902 to previous wookey   view
78 2012-03-26 13:22:55 18339 to previous wookey   view
77 2012-03-23 12:48:14 18339 to previous wookey   view
76 2012-03-19 17:22:15 17661 to previous SvenJoachim   view
75 2012-03-05 17:52:41 17758 to previous wookey   view
74 2012-02-20 02:50:38 17377 to previous JonasSmedegaard Stop playing games, Steve. view
73 2012-02-20 01:25:44 15989 to previous ?SteveLangasek Kill pointless alternative instructions. Multiarch packages are entirely unbackportable. view
72 2012-02-19 16:07:46 17377 to previous JonasSmedegaard CDBS dependency for CDBS packaging (doh), not classic debhelper. view
71 2012-02-19 16:05:59 17305 to previous JonasSmedegaard CDBS itself need no versioning if DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH is resolved explicitly. view
70 2012-02-19 14:26:10 17086 to previous JonasSmedegaard Improved backportability possibly with a little extra work for CDBS and long-form dh_* packages. view
69 2012-02-18 23:13:52 15988 to previous ?SteveLangasek Wrong! A build-dependency is needed on a version of debhelper that implements ${misc:Pre-Depends} for multiarch libraries! view
68 2012-02-18 19:26:40 15916 to previous JonasSmedegaard As with CDBS, long-form dh_* does not need tightened build-dependency on debhelper. view
67 2012-02-18 19:22:28 15979 to previous JonasSmedegaard As mentioned by EvanBroder in rev. 57 you don't need debian/compat = 9 for cdbs; compat 9 only affects dh_auto_configure, which cdbs doesn't use. view
66 2012-02-04 21:00:55 15953 to previous ?BasWijnen Reflect release of debhelper 9 view
65 2012-01-05 17:30:21 16350 to previous wookey   view
64 2012-01-05 07:29:35 16328 to previous ?SteveLangasek revert previous change, which clobbers the copy-pasteable text in favor of linkifying package names, which is of dubious value view
63 2012-01-05 07:07:51 16393 to previous ?mdt   view
62 2012-01-04 21:32:52 16328 to previous ?mdt   view
61 2012-01-04 21:30:56 16335 to previous ?mdt   view
60 2012-01-04 21:25:30 16342 to previous ?mdt   view
59 2011-12-19 03:41:42 16279 to previous JonasSmedegaard Add need for tightened build-dependency on d-shlibs. view
58 2011-12-17 19:07:33 16232 to previous ?KeesCook d-shlibmove view
57 2011-12-16 17:24:41 16122 to previous ?EvanBroder You don't need debian/compat = 9 for cdbs; compat 9 only affects dh_auto_configure, which cdbs doesn't use view
56 2011-12-12 11:02:19 16544 to previous SvenJoachim   view
55 2011-12-11 09:25:41 16569 to previous ?KeesCook Apt changes are not required for intended operation. view
54 2011-12-11 07:46:43 16662 to previous ?CharlesHuber Re-add APT::Architectures info view
53 2011-12-04 19:31:02 16569 to previous ?BrianMurray   view
52 2011-11-18 22:53:19 16531 to previous JordiMallach Add ~ to Build-Depends versioning, as used in the Debhelper example, even if backporting MA support doesn't seem a possibility. view
51 2011-11-03 07:16:33 16528 to previous YunQiangSu The "all" packages should be mark as Multi-Arch: foreign view
50 2011-09-19 02:20:40 15940 to previous ?JonathanNieder disambiguate (see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/09/msg00354.html) view
49 2011-09-18 02:09:12 15937 to previous JonasSmedegaard Fix include bumping debian/compat also for CDBS - which makes it as simple (not more complex!) as short-form dh. view
48 2011-09-07 14:53:43 15529 to previous wookey   view
47 2011-09-07 14:52:05 15528 to previous wookey   view
46 2011-08-29 09:11:50 15462 to previous ?Christopher''''''Halse Rogers -dev packages can be Multi-Arch: same iff they do not contain architecture-dependent headers view
45 2011-08-17 20:00:22 15199 to previous DidierRaboud Add footnote about source.lintian-overrides view
44 2011-08-17 19:47:44 15050 to previous DidierRaboud B-D on debhelper, including backports. view
43 2011-08-05 12:36:01 15049 to previous DidierRaboud Correct wiki markup in "udeb handling" view
42 2011-07-16 04:24:37 15043 to previous JordiMallach Fix *.link -> *.links view
41 2011-06-29 11:51:24 15040 to previous ?TommiVainikainen dpkg from unstable does not support 'foreign-architecture i386' config option view
40 2011-06-28 23:34:17 14943 to previous ?SteveLangasek   view
39 2011-06-27 23:00:04 15127 to previous ?SteveLangasek   view
38 2011-06-27 22:57:15 15127 to previous ?SteveLangasek   view
37 2011-06-24 19:35:07 14461 to previous ?SteveLangasek drop Ubuntu-specific b-d version numbers, as the final versions are now present in Debian and Ubuntu both. view
36 2011-06-10 22:50:40 14689 to previous ?SteveLangasek take away the warning: multiarch in unstable is a reality! view
35 2011-03-30 22:23:55 14925 to previous ?SteveLangasek Ubuntu bug #741949 fixed in natty, drop mention of workaround view
34 2011-03-30 20:05:03 15103 to previous ?KeesCook   view
33 2011-03-24 18:30:21 14997 to previous ?KeesCook ia32-libs note view
32 2011-03-24 06:12:54 14819 to previous ?KeesCook   view
31 2011-03-24 05:57:19 14731 to previous ?SteveLangasek reorder the instructions, so debian/rules can be handled all at once view
30 2011-03-24 05:52:40 14731 to previous ?KeesCook make a note about the -dbg packages for good measure view
29 2011-03-24 05:35:35 14559 to previous ?KeesCook   view
28 2011-03-22 14:58:10 14188 to previous ColinWatson DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH?=... may be needed for dh(1) too view
27 2011-03-22 13:45:18 13949 to previous NeilWilliams   view
26 2011-03-22 13:44:44 13947 to previous NeilWilliams add warning for those who override bits of dh(1) view
25 2011-03-22 06:28:50 13711 to previous ?SteveLangasek mention the .la references issue view
24 2011-03-22 01:53:26 13033 to previous ?SteveLangasek   view
23 2011-03-21 04:36:02 13034 to previous ?SteveLangasek   view
22 2011-03-21 02:06:31 12640 to previous ?SteveLangasek multiarch-support going non-virtual view
21 2011-03-19 21:49:08 12643 to previous ?SteveLangasek document multi-arch: foreign for support packages view
20 2011-03-19 20:53:40 11261 to previous ?SteveLangasek   view
19 2011-03-19 20:44:33 10925 to previous ?SteveLangasek   view
18 2011-03-19 20:39:37 9902 to previous ?SteveLangasek   view
17 2011-03-16 00:45:18 8551 to previous ?SteveLangasek   view
16 2011-03-16 00:30:32 8332 to previous ?SteveLangasek   view
15 2011-03-15 21:11:19 7356 to previous ?SteveLangasek   view
14 2011-03-15 21:05:14 7355 to previous ?SteveLangasek   view
13 2011-03-15 16:48:32 6612 to previous ?SteveLangasek   view
12 2011-03-15 16:30:32 6567 to previous ?SteveLangasek   view
11 2011-03-15 07:36:41 5584 to previous ?SteveLangasek   view
10 2011-03-15 07:35:46 5573 to previous ?SteveLangasek   view
9 2011-03-15 07:33:02 5564 to previous ?SteveLangasek add a disclaimer about this not being ready for Debian view
8 2011-03-15 07:31:11 5339 to previous ?SteveLangasek   view
7 2011-03-15 07:24:29 5159 to previous ?SteveLangasek   view
6 2011-03-15 07:19:31 4481 to previous ?SteveLangasek   view
5 2011-03-15 07:18:56 4480 to previous ?SteveLangasek   view
4 2011-03-15 07:16:44 4464 to previous ?SteveLangasek   view
3 2011-03-15 06:51:31 2961 to previous ?SteveLangasek   view
2 2011-03-15 06:39:49 1635 to previous ?SteveLangasek   view
1 2011-03-15 06:13:03 297 ?SteveLangasek   view