Status of this Page and Changes

NOTE: THIS INITIAL VERSION IS A DRAFT AND NEEDS DISCUSSION.

Rationale

This page and the pages linked from here document best practices for using version control systems in the Java packaging team. It should make it easy to maintain a huge number of packages in an efficient way. But this is not a strict law. You MAY use your own rules if you document them in a central place: README.source. The words MAY, SHOULD, MUST, and others are used as in RFC 2119.

Git and Subversion

The Java packaging team uses either Git or Subversion as a version control system (VCS) on Alioth. All team maintained packages SHOULD use one of those VCS. Packages that do not follow this rule MUST explain their VCS or state the fact of a missing VCS in README.source. Failing to document such deviations in README.source might lead to a bug report with severity serious. All packages MUST use appropriate Vcs-* headers in debian/control. Those headers SHOULD point to the VCS address that allows anonymous access (svn: or git: instead of svn+ssh: or git+ssh:).

You MUST use Git if you are starting a new package.

Existing packages still using Subversion SHOULD be migrated to Git. You SHOULD leave a file MOVED_TO_GIT.txt in the Subversion repository that mentions the new VCS address. See Java/JavaGit for the migration instructions.

You MUST NOT move packages from Git to Subversion because we would lose the history.

Please read Java/JavaGit for Git guidelines and Java/JavaSvn for Subversion guidelines. You SHOULD follow those guidelines. You MUST document any differences of your packaging workflow in README.source. Failing to document them in README.source might lead to a bug report with severity serious.

Default README.source Snippet

You SHOULD maintain a file README.source even if you follow all the rules. You can use the following snippet:

This package uses a version control system as described in
http://wiki.debian.org/Java/JavaVcs and the pages linked from there.

You might need to add more information according to Debian policy Source package handling: `debian/README.source'

Source Format and Patch System

You SHOULD use source source format 3.0 (quilt) if you need to patch the upstream code. Other patch systems like dpatch, cdbs, or plain quilt SHOULD NOT be used. Using the source format 3.0 (quilt) without any patches is OPTIONAL but it makes it easier to add patches in the future. The patches SHOULD follow the Patch Tagging Guidelines as described in DEP-3 which is almost trivial with the gbp-pq tool.

Original Tarball and Upstream Version

Adding a dfsg suffix to every upstream version is OPTIONAL because most of the packages are affected. Creating the original tarball from an upstream Vcs tag is preferred over cleaning up and repacking an upstream archive file in most cases. Packages SHOULD ship debian/watch if possible.

Packages SHOULD implement a get-orig-source target in debian/rules if possible. That MAY be implemented by calling uscan with the appropriate command line arguments. Debian/watch SHOULD call helper tools (like debian/orig-tar.sh) if needed to clean up the original file or to create a tarball from a Vcs tag. These requirements are OPTIONAL if both Debian and upstream are using git and the upstream tarball can be easily created with pristine-tar.

Using pristine-tar is RECOMMENDED for all git maintained packages.


CategoryJava