Differences between revisions 7 and 10 (spanning 3 versions)
Revision 7 as of 2007-08-07 08:58:01
Size: 2018
Editor: BenFinney
Comment: Mailing list discussion: "A possible GFDL compromise"
Revision 10 as of 2007-08-07 14:34:48
Size: 2615
Editor: BenFinney
Comment: date of neroden's FDL article
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 11: Line 11:
 * 2003
  * ["NathanaelNerode"] publishes a brief [http://home.twcny.rr.com/nerode/neroden/fdl.html Why You Shouldn't Use the GNU FDL] article.
 * 2003-08-21 .. 2003-08-28
  * ["BrandenRobinson"] conducts a survey of debian-legal: [http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/08/msg00605.html Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license?], then later [http://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2003/08/msg00270.html posts the results].
 * 2003-08-28
  * ["NathanaelNerode"] [http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/08/msg01115.html proposes a change] to the Debian website, pointing to his brief [http://home.twcny.rr.com/nerode/neroden/fdl.html Why You Shouldn't Use the GNU FDL] article.
Line 25: Line 27:
 * 2003-09-23
  * debian-legal: ["NathanaelNerode"] identifies a [http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/09/msg01203.html key point on which the Debian and FSF positions disagree] with regard to freedom.

This is a loose timeline of the history of the GNU Free Documentation License (FDL) issue within Debian. It's meant to be a "one-stop shop" for people who want to know more.

The [http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl.html official page for the FDL].

Mailing list discussion: