557
Comment: Start a one-URL response page for people asking about the GFDL
|
1353
Link; chronology correction
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 1: | Line 1: |
This is a loose timeline of the history of the GNU Free Documentation License issue within Debian. It's meant to be a "one-stop shop" for people who want to know more. | This is a loose timeline of the history of the GNU Free Documentation License (FDL) issue within Debian. It's meant to be a "one-stop shop" for people who want to know more. |
Line 3: | Line 3: |
* November 2002: the FSF publishes version 1.2 of the GNU Free Documentation License: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl.html * 2003: Manoj publishes draft statement on GFDL: http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/Position_Statement.xhtml * March 12 2006: GR 2006-01 Option 2 passes: "GFDL-licensed works without unmodifiable sections are free": http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001 |
The [http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl.html official page for the FDL]. * 2000-01-19 * Richard Stallman [http://www.debian.org/Lists-Archives/debian-legal-0001/msg00077.html posts a draft of version 1.0] of the GNU FDL; this began immediate discussion on the terms, and version 1.0 appears not to have been officially published. * 2000-03 *the FSF publishes [http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/fdl-1.1.txt version 1.1 of the GNU FDL]. * 2002-11 * the FSF publishes version 1.2 of the GNU FDL. * 2003 * ["NathanaelNerode"] publishes a brief [http://home.twcny.rr.com/nerode/neroden/fdl.html Why You Shouldn't Use the GNU FDL] article. * 2003-09-15 * ["Manoj Srivastava"] [http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/09/msg00703.html publishes] a draft [http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/Position_Statement.xhtml Debian position statement on the FDL]. * 2006-03-12 * [http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001 Debian GR 2006-01] Option 2 passes: "GFDL-licensed works without unmodifiable sections are free". * 2006-09-26 * the FSF [http://www.fsf.org/news/gfdl-dd1.html publishes the first discussion draft for version 2 of the GNU FDL]. |
This is a loose timeline of the history of the GNU Free Documentation License (FDL) issue within Debian. It's meant to be a "one-stop shop" for people who want to know more.
The [http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl.html official page for the FDL].
- 2000-01-19
Richard Stallman [http://www.debian.org/Lists-Archives/debian-legal-0001/msg00077.html posts a draft of version 1.0] of the GNU FDL; this began immediate discussion on the terms, and version 1.0 appears not to have been officially published.
- 2000-03
the FSF publishes [http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/fdl-1.1.txt version 1.1 of the GNU FDL].
- 2002-11
- the FSF publishes version 1.2 of the GNU FDL.
- 2003
["NathanaelNerode"] publishes a brief [http://home.twcny.rr.com/nerode/neroden/fdl.html Why You Shouldn't Use the GNU FDL] article.
- 2003-09-15
["Manoj Srivastava"] [http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/09/msg00703.html publishes] a draft [http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/Position_Statement.xhtml Debian position statement on the FDL].
- 2006-03-12
[http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001 Debian GR 2006-01] Option 2 passes: "GFDL-licensed works without unmodifiable sections are free".
- 2006-09-26
the FSF [http://www.fsf.org/news/gfdl-dd1.html publishes the first discussion draft for version 2 of the GNU FDL].