Differences between revisions 64 and 65
Revision 64 as of 2010-08-23 14:22:41
Size: 10088
Comment: + initial examples categorization, comparison of 5 NAS', few descriptions, fixed link
Revision 65 as of 2010-08-23 14:34:36
Size: 10276
Comment: Despite the title, not all free. Leave out the non-free and the link by adding own description for free ones?
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 70: Line 70:
  * 5 free NAS servers comparison (): http://www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/reports/7153/1/   * 5 NAS servers comparison: [[http://freenas.org/doku.php|FreeNAS]], [[http://www.cryptonas.org/|CryptoNAS]] (formerly CryptoBox), [[http://www.openfiler.com/|Openfiler]], NASLite-M2 (proprietary) and NanoNAS (proprietary): http://www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/reports/7153/1/

Freedom Box Project

Inspired by Eben Moglen's vision of a small, cheap and simple computer that serves freedom in the home, we are building a Debian-based platform for distributed applications.

Freedom Box is about:

  • privacy
  • control
  • ease of use
  • dehierarchicalization

1. Vision Statement

We live in a world where our use of the network is mediated by organizations that often do not have our best interests at heart. By building software that does not rely on a central service, we can regain control and privacy. By keeping our data in our homes, we gain useful legal protections over it. By giving back power to the users over their networks and machines, we are returning the Internet to its intended peer-to-peer architecture.

In order to bring about the new network order, it is paramount that it is easy to convert to it. The hardware it runs on must be cheap. The software it runs on must be easy to install and admimistrate by anybody. It must be easy to transition from existing services.

There are a number of projects working to realize a future of distributed services; we aim to bring them all together in a convenient package.

2. Objectives

This is the result of a brainstorm from the debconf team.

  • enable people to reclaim their privacy and control of their data
  • return to the peer to peer nature of the net (vs. tendency towards hierarchical organization)
  • making a consumer product
  • easy to use for everyone (pre-installed, easily configured, easily restored)
  • inexpensive (dirt cheap)
  • use at home (expand: legal significance of 4th amendment context)

  • smooth transition from cloud services (e.g. social networks)
  • secure routing
  • generic and configurable
  • extensible
  • want hardware makers to be enthusiastic about the project

3. Stakeholders

  • Users
  • Content Providers
  • Service Providers
  • Network Providers
  • Developers
  • Device Makers

4. Project Resources

6. Example projects

  • Storage
    • ReadyNAS - proprietary parts sold on top of Debian running SPARC hardware. similar to freedombox but targetting home storage only, with a web interface, rahter than lots of applications, althogh there were some (like BitTorrent.) Point is really to look at them as a model of how to sell Debian preinstalled in display-less computers.

    • OpenMediaVault (which ?isn't released yet, but looks like it has an excellent and comprehensive panel, similar to that used by the ReadyNAS.)

    • 5 NAS servers comparison: FreeNAS, CryptoNAS (formerly ?CryptoBox), Openfiler, NASLite-M2 (proprietary) and NanoNAS (proprietary): http://www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/reports/7153/1/

    • ownCloud, data storage project from the wider KDE community

    • Wuala, Distributed, redundant, encrypted (zero-knowledge), and online file storage (closed source)

  • Telephony
    • Asterisk (appliances, live CD's)

    • PlugBPX, a project to turn the sheeva plug into a simple Asterisk server

  • Networking
  • Social
  • Other
    • PogoPlug: Proprietary software stack to run on plug computers and provide "personal cloud" storage and access (dynamicDNS, access control, web configuration)

    • Tonido, local cloud services on a sheeva plug device. Proprietary software on top of Ubuntu jaunty.

    • SmoothWall - firewall distro

    • IP Cop - firewall distro

    • Aegir (Drupal-based control panel)

    • Webmin, mature web-based *nix sys administration - easy to use from anywehere, no X necessary.

    • SPACE service platform for distributable services, with (KDE) desktop integration and (Eucalyptus) cloud backend

    • Tidbit: A global database for exchanging signed tidbits of information

7. Relevant protocols

  • Identity
    • Email
    • WebID, draft definition of URI to definining "you" on the semantic web - i.e. works directly with FAOF, Sparql etc. Draft implementation seemlessly fallback to resolving via Webfinger if no FOAF data resolved.

  • user info (metadata)
    • Webfinger, draft of a protocol for getting user info (metadata) associated with e-mail via HTTP

    • Fingerpoint, draft of a protocol for getting user info (metadata) associated with e-mail via HTTP - requires minimal implementation (need no processing beyond static http to serve an identity!) and works directly with FOAF and Sparql.

  • Messaging

8. ToDo

  • setup a core/coordination team (ie. people that are actually going to work on this)
  • What we need
  • What we have
  • How to contribute
  • Who else is doing similar stuff

9. Done

10. Areas of work / architecture

  • project management tool
  • installer
  • UI
  • config
  • telephony
  • mail
  • hardware support
  • calendaring
  • IRC proxy (maybe even server?)
  • statusnet instance

11. Issues

  • How is each box discovered and identified?
    • Need some way of finding your mates Most ISPs provide dynamic IPs. Would need to reply on external dynamic DNS service. (everyone ele's Freedom boxes?)
  • Upstream bandwidth
    • Very limited with typcial ADSL connections. How much of a problem is that if people keep downling photos from it whilst you try to use the net?
  • Mail
    • If the box does mail then spam is a problem. Running spamassassin dramitically increases resource requirements on box Collective spam processing is effective because it is easy to identify mass-mailing. Would need to do this in distributed manner (razor-style?)
  • Identity management
    • Important to be able to identify yourself on various services so you know email and facebook and whatever IDs are all you, and should refer back to this FB for authentication. How do we do it? Is it needed in order to realise that an email addy is freedom-able and so signing/encryption can be used? Multiple identities needed e.g for two sites (e.g. home+college) or ID for FB and ID for mobile phone?
  • Two boxes in one building (son brings FB home from college)
    • Movable, transportable
    • If a box is moved from one location to another and plugged in again, how does it continue to do what it was doing seamlessly?
  • Storage: if it hosts all data one produces, plus backup from friends, it needs much bigger storage than the default Sheevaplug/Guruplug. 512MB won't last long for photo, videos and such.

12. Target Hardware

  • ?SheevaPlug/GuruPlug

    • Latter has WiFi and can act as an access point

    • Older designs of both had heat problems.
  • OpenRD

    • Same hardware platform as the ?SheevaPlug, more flexible and more expensive

  • NSLU2
    • Discontinued?
  • Fonera 2.0n

    • Slow and very limited memory (64MB)
  • FitPC

13. Project Details

  • ?Requirements