Differences between revisions 5 and 6
Revision 5 as of 2010-09-09 09:30:21
Size: 4670
Editor: ?GregorHerrmann
Comment: add Article 12 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Revision 6 as of 2010-09-09 09:31:29
Size: 4670
Editor: ?GregorHerrmann
Comment: typo
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 33: Line 33:
  * [[http://esw.w3.org/WebID|WebID]], draft definition of URI to definining "you" on the semantic web - i.e. works directly with FAOF, Sparql etc. Draft implementation seemlessly fallback to resolving via Webfinger if no FOAF data resolved.   * [[http://esw.w3.org/WebID|WebID]], draft definition of URI to definining "you" on the semantic web - i.e. works directly with FOAF, Sparql etc. Draft implementation seemlessly fallback to resolving via Webfinger if no FOAF data resolved.

Objectives

This is the result of a brainstorm from the debconf team.

  • enable people to reclaim their privacy and control of their data
  • return to the peer to peer nature of the net (vs. tendency towards hierarchical organization)
  • making a consumer product
  • easy to use for everyone (pre-installed, easily configured, easily restored)
  • inexpensive (dirt cheap)
  • use at home (expand: legal significance of 4th amendment context; non US-specific: Article 12 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights)

  • smooth transition from cloud services (e.g. social networks)
  • secure routing
  • generic and configurable
  • extensible
  • want hardware makers to be enthusiastic about the project and not hide their specs

Stakeholders

  • Users
  • Content Providers
  • Service Providers
  • Network Providers
  • Developers
  • Device Makers

Relevant protocols

  • Identity
    • Email
    • WebID, draft definition of URI to definining "you" on the semantic web - i.e. works directly with FOAF, Sparql etc. Draft implementation seemlessly fallback to resolving via Webfinger if no FOAF data resolved.

  • user info (metadata)
    • Webfinger, draft of a protocol for getting user info (metadata) associated with e-mail via HTTP

    • Fingerpoint, draft of a protocol for getting user info (metadata) associated with e-mail via HTTP - requires minimal implementation (need no processing beyond static http to serve an identity!) and works directly with FOAF and Sparql.

  • Messaging

Areas of work / architecture

  • project management tool
  • installer
  • UI
  • config
  • telephony
  • mail
  • hardware support
  • calendaring
  • IRC proxy (maybe even server?)
  • statusnet instance

Issues

  • How is each box discovered and identified?
    • Need some way of finding your mates
    • Most ISPs provide dynamic IPs. Would need to reply on external dynamic DNS service. (everyone ele's Freedom boxes?)
  • Upstream bandwidth
    • Very limited with typcial ADSL connections. How much of a problem is that if people keep downling photos from it whilst you try to use the net?
  • Mail
    • If the box does mail then spam is a problem. Running spamassassin dramitically increases resource requirements on box
    • Collective spam processing is effective because it is easy to identify mass-mailing. Would need to do this in distributed manner (razor-style?)
  • Identity management
    • Important to be able to identify yourself on various services so you know email and facebook and whatever IDs are all you, and should refer back to this FB for authentication. How do we do it? Is it needed in order to realise that an email addy is freedom-able and so signing/encryption can be used?
    • Multiple identities needed e.g for two sites (e.g. home+college) or ID for FB and ID for mobile phone?
  • Two boxes in one building (son brings FB home from college)
    • Movable, transportable
    • If a box is moved from one location to another and plugged in again, how does it continue to do what it was doing seamlessly?
  • Storage: if it hosts all data one produces, plus backup from friends, it needs to house adequate storage, preferably commodity sata disks.
    • For a purely online storage solution, this would be ok, but we would need a way to plug in or configure external storage. For example, I would want to plug in an external hard drive or configure it to use a NAS or a Eucalyptus cloud that someone I know operates.
  • Name of the project: Freedombox is apparently copyrighted, or at least the domain is taken by a company: http://freedombox.net.

General ToDo

  • setup a core/coordination team (ie. people that are actually going to work on this)
  • What we need
  • What we have
  • How to contribute
  • Who else is doing similar stuff

Done