541
Comment:
|
870
add urweb
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 3: | Line 3: |
* Mailutils. Should we build-depend on mailutils? | * Mailutils. Should we build-depend on mailutils? |
Line 5: | Line 5: |
* Package compatibility. We need to check that not too many packages are broken | * Package compatibility. We need to check that not too many packages are broken |
Line 10: | Line 10: |
- org-iswitchb seems to have gone away with the upgrade to 26.1. Not completely sure how that happened. Maybe I was using the built org only for that one function. org-switchb seems an acceptable substitute. The renaming is a minor annoyance for compatibility [[DavidBremner]] | * org-iswitchb seems to have gone away with the upgrade to 26.1. Not completely sure how that happened. Maybe I was using the built org only for that one function. org-switchb seems an acceptable substitute. The renaming is a minor annoyance for compatibility [[DavidBremner]] * [[https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=emacs26-ftbfs;users=debian-emacsen@lists.debian.org|FTBFS bugs]] * Following reverse-deps were not tested as not buildable atm: lintian, acl2, urweb * The dependency bounds are too loose; you can install 'emacs' 26.1 and 'emacs-nox' 25.2 right now; rlb to fix |
This page tracks work/issues on getting emacs 26 into Buster
- Mailutils. Should we build-depend on mailutils?
- Package compatibility. We need to check that not too many packages are broken
- by emacs 26, and file appropriate bugs.
Known Issues
org-iswitchb seems to have gone away with the upgrade to 26.1. Not completely sure how that happened. Maybe I was using the built org only for that one function. org-switchb seems an acceptable substitute. The renaming is a minor annoyance for compatibility DavidBremner
- Following reverse-deps were not tested as not buildable atm: lintian, acl2, urweb
- The dependency bounds are too loose; you can install 'emacs' 26.1 and 'emacs-nox' 25.2 right now; rlb to fix