Differences between revisions 11 and 12
Revision 11 as of 2006-12-17 03:23:10
Size: 859
Revision 12 as of 2009-03-16 03:35:57
Size: 859
Editor: anonymous
Comment: converted to 1.6 markup
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 19: Line 19:
 * ["Slum"]  * [[Slum]]

Since the RC bugs are a critical issue, every developer should make sure his/her packages are as neat as possible. Perhaps we are too lame and don't give our packages the love they deserve? If so, what can we do about it? More co-maintenance? More checks? Harsher policy?

Note: I am probably the lamest of all and this isn't meant to insult anyone

Watch files could be used more often to simplify the tracking and packaging of latest versions of upstream programs.

-- true, but that's not an issue for release-quality (at least not very much) -- robert

-- Perhaps there's something missing in the New Maintainer's vetting/training process? "Due diligence" comes to mind.

-- See also:

Back to ReleaseProposals