Differences between revisions 50 and 52 (spanning 2 versions)
Revision 50 as of 2005-08-18 10:18:09
Size: 5571
Editor: anonymous
Comment:
Revision 52 as of 2005-08-24 08:18:16
Size: 4589
Editor: anonymous
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 5: Line 5:
   * DebianEdu DebianScience will share a lot of common with DebianEdu. Does it even deserve to be a separate project (more focused on the research side)?    * DebianEdu - DebianScience will share a lot of common with DebianEdu. Does it even deserve to be a separate project (more focused on the research side)?
Line 25: Line 25:
   * [http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/ Debtags]: science application should all be properly tagged. More information [http://lists.debian.org/debian-med/2005/07/msg00083.html there].    * [http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/ Debtags]: science applications should all be properly tagged. More information [http://lists.debian.org/debian-med/2005/07/msg00083.html there].
Line 69: Line 69:

== (Other) People who expressed interest in debian-science mailing-list ==
According to the [http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=320275 list creation request]:

(Is it relevant to keep such a list?)

 * Don Armstrong
 * [http://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2005/08/msg00070.html Rick Bahague]
 * Ben Burton
 * [http://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2005/08/msg00048.html FreeFall]
 * [http://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2005/08/msg00072.html Guilherme P. de Freitas]
 * Yaroslav Halchenko
 * Mikko Haikonen
 * FredericLehobey
 * Andre Lehovich
 * DanielLeidert
 * [http://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2005/08/msg00056.html Michele]
 * Victor Munoz
 * [http://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2005/08/msg00061.html Matthew Nobes]
 * [http://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2005/08/msg00057.html Stéphane Péchard]
 * [http://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2005/08/msg00075.html Yann Pouillon]
 * Juergen Salk
 * Carlo Segre
 * Kenward Vaughan
 * Elijah Wright

Debian maintainers of scientific tools