Size: 6712
Comment: http://ddtp.debian.net -> https://ddtp2.debian.net
|
← Revision 46 as of 2020-04-20 05:07:38 ⇥
Size: 6596
Comment: cleanups
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 4: | Line 4: |
There is clearly a [[http://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2005/07/msg00004.html|demand]] for [[http://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2005/07/msg00002.html|that]]. There is also [[http://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2007/02/msg00013.html|interest]] for creating meta packages or a [[http://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2007/02/msg00021.html|tasksel task]]. | There is clearly a [[https://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2005/07/msg00004.html|demand]] for [[https://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2005/07/msg00002.html|that]]. There is also [[https://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2007/02/msg00013.html|interest]] for creating meta packages or a [[https://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2007/02/msg00021.html|tasksel task]]. |
Line 7: | Line 7: |
As [[http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/|Debtags]] are being [[http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/07/msg00016.html|integrated into Packages files]] it might be the way to go. | |
Line 9: | Line 8: |
* [[http://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2005/08/msg00005.html|Enrico Zini]] is willing to assist but is looking for someone else to come up with some initial set of categories to discuss. [[http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/paper-debtags.html#debtags-theoretical-foundations|Relevant reading]]. * Debtags [[http://alioth.debian.org/mail/?group_id=30454|mailing list subscriptions and archives]]. [[http://alioth.debian.org/projects/debtags|Debtags on Alioth]]. * Some guidelines: DebTaggingGuidelines * Read also : http://www.enricozini.org/2007/paper-debconf7/ * [[http://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2005/08/msg00033.html|Debtags and debram merging]] * [[http://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2005/08/msg00003.html|Thaddeus H. Black]] has expressed his involvement in the Debtags effort. He is also the author of the former debram effort that classified some science software in the 14 division. See [[http://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2005/08/msg00003.html|his message]]. |
As [[https://debtags.debian.org/|Debtags]] are being [[https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/07/msg00016.html|integrated into Packages files]] it might be the way to go. * [[https://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2005/08/msg00005.html|Enrico Zini]] is willing to assist but is looking for someone else to come up with some initial set of categories to discuss. [[https://debtags.debian.org/paper-debtags.html#debtags-theoretical-foundations|Relevant reading]]. * [[https://salsa.debian.org/debtags-team/|Debtags on Salsa]]. * [[Debtags/TaggingGuidelines|Tagging guidelines]] * Read also: https://www.enricozini.org/blog/2007/paper-debconf7/ * [[https://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2005/08/msg00033.html|Debtags and debram merging]] * [[https://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2005/08/msg00003.html|Thaddeus H. Black]] has expressed his involvement in the Debtags effort. He is also the author of the former debram effort that classified some science software in the 14 division. See [[https://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2005/08/msg00003.html|his message]]. |
Line 17: | Line 18: |
Line 20: | Line 22: |
Line 23: | Line 26: |
# aptitude install dh-buildinfo libept-dev libept-dev libwibble-dev libwibble-dev libfltk1.1-dev fluid $ wget "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=5;filename=goscience-merida.patch;att=1;bug=474603" -O goscience-merida.patch |
# apt install dh-buildinfo libept-dev libept-dev libwibble-dev libwibble-dev libfltk1.1-dev fluid $ wget "https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=5;filename=goscience-merida.patch;att=1;bug=474603" -O goscience-merida.patch |
Line 35: | Line 38: |
http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/ssearch.html and tag software that has not been properly tagged:http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/todo.html | https://debtags.debian.org/search/ and tag software that has not been properly tagged: https://debtags.debian.org/reports/todo/ |
Line 48: | Line 51: |
Another QA effort that might be related is the PackagesDescriptionsReview. It may even be [[http://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2005/08/msg00040.html|the one to focus on first]]. | Another QA effort that might be related is the PackagesDescriptionsReview. It may even be [[https://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2005/08/msg00040.html|the one to focus on first]]. |
Line 50: | Line 53: |
There is also the [[https://ddtp2.debian.net/|ddtp (in lack of a better link)]] effort to translate the packages descriptions. | There is also the [[https://ddtp.debian.org/|ddtp]] effort to translate the packages descriptions. |
Line 53: | Line 56: |
The scientific fields in wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fields_of_science | The scientific fields in wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fields_of_science |
Line 63: | Line 66: |
You can [[http://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2007/02/msg00011.html|follow]] this thread to see all opinions. '''Please''' add a wiki link to the following categories if it already exists a Debian Science wiki page related to any of the following. Try to spell out the categories to avoid mistakes, as [[http://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2007/02/msg00035.html|suggested]]. |
You can [[https://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2007/02/msg00011.html|follow]] this thread to see all opinions. '''Please''' add a wiki link to the following categories if it already exists a Debian Science wiki page related to any of the following. Try to spell out the categories to avoid mistakes, as [[https://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2007/02/msg00035.html|suggested]]. |
Line 66: | Line 69: |
* [[DebianScience/Biology|science-biology]] - It has been [[http://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2007/02/msg00031.html|suggested]] to make it depend on med-bio and med-bio-dev; this suggestion works for the purpose of installation but has certain drawbacks for other CDD tools. Perhaps the best solution is to sync the contents of the med-bio tasks file with science-bio tasks file. * [[DebianScience/Physics|science-physics]] - adopt dependencies from [[http://packages.debian.org/unstable/misc/education-physics|education-physics]] * [[DebianScience/Chemistry|science-chemistry]] - plus adopt dependencies from [[http://packages.debian.org/unstable/misc/education-chemistry|education-chemistry]] |
* [[DebianScience/Biology|science-biology]] - It has been [[https://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2007/02/msg00031.html|suggested]] to make it depend on med-bio and med-bio-dev; this suggestion works for the purpose of installation but has certain drawbacks for other CDD tools. Perhaps the best solution is to sync the contents of the med-bio tasks file with science-bio tasks file. * [[DebianScience/Physics|science-physics]] - adopt dependencies from [[https://packages.debian.org/unstable/misc/education-physics|education-physics]] * [[DebianScience/Chemistry|science-chemistry]] - plus adopt dependencies from [[https://packages.debian.org/unstable/misc/education-chemistry|education-chemistry]] |
Line 72: | Line 75: |
* [[DebianScience/Astronomy|science-astronomy]] - plus adopt dependencies from [[http://packages.debian.org/unstable/misc/education-astronomy|education-astronomy]] | * [[DebianScience/Astronomy|science-astronomy]] - plus adopt dependencies from [[https://packages.debian.org/unstable/misc/education-astronomy|education-astronomy]] |
Line 82: | Line 85: |
* science-pharmaceuticals - It has been [[http://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2007/02/msg00045.html|suggested]] to leave this to Debian-Med (do not hesitate to list the packages you are interested in here) | * science-pharmaceuticals - It has been [[https://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2007/02/msg00045.html|suggested]] to leave this to Debian-Med (do not hesitate to list the packages you are interested in here) |
Line 89: | Line 92: |
* science-anthropology - It has been [[http://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2007/02/msg00037.html|suggested]] to be the same as archaeology | * science-anthropology - It has been [[https://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2007/02/msg00037.html|suggested]] to be the same as archaeology |
Line 93: | Line 96: |
* science-medical-imaging - [[http://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2007/02/msg00045.html|Covered]] by debian-med * science-psychology - It has been [[http://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2007/02/msg00045.html|suggested]] to leave this to debian-med |
* science-medical-imaging - [[https://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2007/02/msg00045.html|Covered]] by debian-med * science-psychology - It has been [[https://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2007/02/msg00045.html|suggested]] to leave this to debian-med |
Classification of scientific software in Debian
The goal of this page is to discuss how software used for DebianScience could be properly classified.
There is clearly a demand for that. There is also interest for creating meta packages or a tasksel task.
Debtags
As Debtags are being integrated into Packages files it might be the way to go.
Enrico Zini is willing to assist but is looking for someone else to come up with some initial set of categories to discuss. Relevant reading.
Read also: https://www.enricozini.org/blog/2007/paper-debconf7/
Thaddeus H. Black has expressed his involvement in the Debtags effort. He is also the author of the former debram effort that classified some science software in the 14 division. See his message.
Playing with 'goscience'
goscience is a patch (474603) to goplay that takes advantage for science packages of the easy debtags browsing features of goplay.
Building a patched goplay package
The recipe is for sid.
# apt install dh-buildinfo libept-dev libept-dev libwibble-dev libwibble-dev libfltk1.1-dev fluid $ wget "https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=5;filename=goscience-merida.patch;att=1;bug=474603" -O goscience-merida.patch $ apt-get source goplay $ cd goplay-0.3/ $ patch -p 1 < ../goscience-merida.patch $ debuild -uc -us # dpkg -i goplay_0.3-1_i386.deb $ goscience &
Debtags already existing for the 'field' facet
You can search for the already tagged software with the debtags interface: https://debtags.debian.org/search/ and tag software that has not been properly tagged: https://debtags.debian.org/reports/todo/
- field::astronomy
- field::biology
- field::chemistry
- field::electronics
- field::geography
- field::linguistics
- field::mathematics
- field::physics
- field::statistics
Other QA
Another QA effort that might be related is the PackagesDescriptionsReview. It may even be the one to focus on first.
There is also the ddtp effort to translate the packages descriptions.
Tags discussion
The scientific fields in wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fields_of_science
The possible tags for Debian science related projects could be
- visualization - programs like gnuplot, labplot, mayavi etc.,
- data processing - programs like octave
- diagrams - programs like dia, xfig
- publishing - programs like latex, bibtex etc.,
Proposed categories
You can follow this thread to see all opinions. Please add a wiki link to the following categories if it already exists a Debian Science wiki page related to any of the following. Try to spell out the categories to avoid mistakes, as suggested.
science-biology - It has been suggested to make it depend on med-bio and med-bio-dev; this suggestion works for the purpose of installation but has certain drawbacks for other CDD tools. Perhaps the best solution is to sync the contents of the med-bio tasks file with science-bio tasks file.
science-physics - adopt dependencies from education-physics
science-chemistry - plus adopt dependencies from education-chemistry
science-genomics - It has been suggested to make this a sub topic of ?science-biology, something like science-biology-genomics possibly with a dummy package science-biology-full - not separately available in Debian-Med
science-astronomy - plus adopt dependencies from education-astronomy
The following categories were suggested but not covered by any dependency
The discussion revealed a huge lot of suggested fields but the people who suggested a field forgot / were not able to add any package that would be useful in the field. So these categories are subject to removal from the list but are here for further reference.
science-bibliography - It has been suggested to merge this with DebianScience/Typesetting science-publishing]
- science-structural
- science-architectural
- science-mechanical
science-pharmaceuticals - It has been suggested to leave this to Debian-Med (do not hesitate to list the packages you are interested in here)
- science-signal-processing
- science-agricultural
- science-geophysical
- science-climatology
- science-fluid-dynamics
- science-archaeology
science-anthropology - It has been suggested to be the same as archaeology
- science-sociology
- science-economics
- science-geography
science-medical-imaging - Covered by debian-med
science-psychology - It has been suggested to leave this to debian-med
- science-linguistics
- science-hci