3219
Comment:
|
3269
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 31: | Line 31: |
* New Release Prospectus at: VancouverProspectus |
Unofficial Release Related Info and Links
Read http://www.debian.org/devel/testing first.
Read the Release-Updates (e.g. http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/02/msg00010.html )
See the release team site http://release.debian.org/
RC Bugs and blockers
RC Bug Squashing Primer: http://people.debian.org/~vorlon/rc-bugsquashing.html
Filter more updated RC bug list using: http://tinyurl.com/5vgtq (bts.turmzimmer.net)
Why is package X not in testing yet? (includes top blocking packages): http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/
Definition: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities
Sarge RC policy: http://release.debian.org/sarge_rc_policy.txt
Canonical RC bug lists: http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/
- See below for info about missing binaries.
- debian installer bugs?
ftp.debian.org bugs (see packages needing removal): http://bugs.debian.org/ftp.debian.org
- 2005/03/02 testing-proposed-updates and testing-security buildd's still need programming and setup?
- ...
Current proposals:
Archive Verification for Sarge? (DWN article at: http://www.debian.org/News/weekly/2005/08/ )
Linux kernel for Sarge (DWN article at: http://www.debian.org/News/weekly/2005/06/ says 2.6.8 for 2.6)
- ...
Misc
Responsibilities of ftp masters (e.g. http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2005/02/msg00184.html ).
debian-release@d.o officially archived on the web at http://lists.debian.org/debian-release (perhaps searchable keywords to http://www.google.com/search?q=%22debian-release%22+site%3Alists.debian.org )
See ReleaseProposals for proposed/proposing changes to the release process.
New Release Prospectus at: VancouverProspectus
Release documentation is handled by debian-doc? Release notes under development at: http://cvs.debian.org/ddp/manuals.sgml/release-notes/en/release-notes.en.sgml?cvsroot=debian-doc
Real i386 info: http://higgs.djpig.de/upgrade-i386/
Testing security issues: http://merkel.debian.org/~joeyh/testing-security.html
buildd status: http://buildd.debian.org/stats (and http://buildd.net/ ?)
Package hasn't been uploaded for one or more architectures,
http://www.debian.org/devel/testing under "My package is stalled because it's out of date on some architecture. What do I do?"
Check the buildd logs ( http://buildd.debian.org ) for failures and queue status (see http://www.debian.org/devel/buildd/ ).
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-porting
- It's better to have a buildd build a package to make sure that one can be used to do any future security builds.
Out-of-date binaries: http://people.debian.org/~igloo/status.php
- ...
Other resources (todo/links to find)?
- debian-installer (d-i) info?
- Answer "Release Candidate" means? (i.e. brittany qualificaitons list)
- Relate info above to availability and temporary problems (was in early revisions of this page?)
- Relate above info to new or critical uploads (was in early revisions of this page?)
- It'd be nice to show packages that have a large tree of reverse dependancies (like flac, openldap, shadow...).