Differences between revisions 27 and 29 (spanning 2 versions)
Revision 27 as of 2010-11-12 09:12:13
Size: 3377
Comment: manchester comes
Revision 29 as of 2010-11-15 00:56:16
Size: 3533
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 3: Line 3:
It seems somewhat amazing, but most of the Debian Med contributors have never met in person before. We think that to maximise the user experience, we shall get together, talk about more than our individual packages and identify some lower and some not-so-low-hanging fruits. It seems somewhat amazing, but most of the [[DebianMed|Debian Med]] contributors have never met in person before. We think that to maximise the user experience, we shall get together, talk about more than our individual packages and identify some lower and some not-so-low-hanging fruits.
Line 13: Line 13:
||1|| Steffen Möller || moeller_debian.org || Debian || Lübeck (D) || 28.01.2011 || 31.01.2010 || ||1|| Steffen Möller || moeller_debian.org || U Lübeck (Debian) || Lübeck (D) || 28.01.2011 || 31.01.2010 ||
Line 15: Line 15:
||3|| Tim Booth || tbooth_ceh.ac.uk || [[http://nebc.nerc.ac.uk/tools/bio-linux-5/bio-linux-5.0|BioLinux]] || Oxford (UK) || 28.01.2011 || 31.01.2010 ||
||4|| Pjotr Prins || || Debian        || Wageningen/Groningen (NL)|| || ||
||5|| Alan Williams || || Taverna       || Manchester (UK) || || ||
||3|| Tim Booth || tbooth_ceh.ac.uk || [[http://nebc.nerc.ac.uk/tools/bio-linux-5/bio-linux-5.0|NERC]] (BioLinux) || Oxford (UK) || 28.01.2011 || 31.01.2010 ||
||4|| Pjotr Prins || || U Wageningen (Debian) || Wageningen/Groningen (NL)|| || ||
||5|| Alan Williams || || U Manchester (Taverna)|| Manchester (UK) || || ||
Line 44: Line 44:
 * strategies for further development
  * thinning the line between Debian and upstream
 * organisational issues
Line 49: Line 48:
 * strategies for further development
  * thinning the line between Debian and upstream
  * thinning the line between Debian and educators
Line 55: Line 57:
== Reports ==

Line 62: Line 61:
 * your organisation could be listed here  * travel support by U Manchester, NERC
 * we still hope for some external contributions

Debian Med Blend meeting in Lübeck

It seems somewhat amazing, but most of the Debian Med contributors have never met in person before. We think that to maximise the user experience, we shall get together, talk about more than our individual packages and identify some lower and some not-so-low-hanging fruits.

Location, Date

Participants

No

Name

Email

Organisation

Living in

Arrival at

Departure at

1

Steffen Möller

moeller_debian.org

U Lübeck (Debian)

Lübeck (D)

28.01.2011

31.01.2010

2

Andreas Tille

tille_debian.org

Debian

Wernigerode (D)

28.01.2011

31.01.2010

3

Tim Booth

tbooth_ceh.ac.uk

NERC (?BioLinux)

Oxford (UK)

28.01.2011

31.01.2010

4

Pjotr Prins

U Wageningen (Debian)

Wageningen/Groningen (NL)

5

Alan Williams

U Manchester (Taverna)

Manchester (UK)

6

Hajo Krabbenhöft

M.sc. student

Lübeck (D)

28.01.2011

31.01.2010

7

Yask Gupta

Ph.D. student

Lübeck (D)

28.01.2011

31.01.2010

8

Kushal Sejwal

Ph.D. student

Würzburg (D)

28.01.2011

31.01.2010

  • Pending: Goettingen, Cambridge, Glasgow, Stockholm, Helsinki, Hamburg

Agenda

  • improving our interaction with BioLinux

  • integration of public resources
    • brainstorm about how data.debian.org could help
    • review getData and link it with several packages

  • review of latest developments
    • Bio* roundup
    • Ensembl
    • Cloud computing
    • Next generation sequencing
    • BioLib

      • strategies for packaging with minimal redundancy across packages
      • first upload to experimental
    • Taverna

      • formulating joint workflows
      • identify missing packagings
      • plan for packaging Taverna itself
  • organisational issues
    • ties to pkg-java

    • relation to other Blends

    • identify missing packages and setting priorities
  • strategies for further development
    • thinning the line between Debian and upstream
    • thinning the line between Debian and educators
    • outreach
      • first joint paper recently accepted in BMC Bioinformatics
      • papers citing or mentioning us
      • books and book chapters

Acknowledgements

the sprint has been possible thanks to:

  • travel support by U Manchester, NERC
  • we still hope for some external contributions


CategorySprint