Differences between revisions 4 and 5
⇤ ← Revision 4 as of 2009-04-29 21:09:09 →
Size: 1089
Editor: ?NathanStrattonTreadway
Comment:
← Revision 5 as of 2010-04-10 19:38:27 → ⇥
Size: 1120
Editor: BenHutchings
Comment: Correct policy regarding additional hardware support
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 5: Line 5:
 * Security Fixes
 * Driver Fixes
 * Stability Fixes
... actually, more or less any type of fix		  * Bug fixes
 * Support for additional hardware (new drivers and extension of existing drivers) which has been accepted upstream

The Debian Kernel team aims to provide kernels for our users that are functional, free, and secure, with a minimal divergence from upstream.

Patches the kernel team like:

  • Bug fixes
  • Support for additional hardware (new drivers and extension of existing drivers) which has been accepted upstream

Patches the kernel team generally reject:

  • New features
  • Out-of Tree Drivers
  • My favourite patch-set

The best way to get a patch into the Debian kernel is to get it accepted upstream first. Not only does this signify a certain level of quality, but it gives us a guarantee that we will be able to drop this patch from our Debian-specific tree at some point.

Note: waldi explained in <20080717224521.GA3835@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org> when someone pointed to this page "Which is only the case for the main images. We have support for additional feature sets, which have less strict rules." and nobody objected (nor explained what the lesser rules were).