Differences between revisions 3 and 4
Revision 3 as of 2004-02-15 15:37:54
Size: 1155
Editor: anonymous
Revision 4 as of 2004-02-21 13:59:19
Size: 1158
Editor: anonymous
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 16: Line 16:
'''Question''': Is the DebianInstaller going to graphical in nature? '''Question''': Is the DebianInstaller going to be graphical in nature?

Debian-Installer: FAQ

Please add your own questions here. It's a Wiki. Just Click the EDIT button.

Question: Is the DebianInstaller project not going to use PGI because PGI only works for i386 ?

Answer: PGI works not only in i386 but in other architectures, like ["IA64"], too - I've read this in PGI documentation. From http://www.progeny.com/products/pgi/guide.html#id2781733 :

 PGI is architecture-independent and has been designed for 
 portability. In its first release, PGI supports the Intel x86
 and IA-64 architectures. Hooks are in place for developers on
 other architectures to add support for their platforms without
 having to make infrastructural changes to PGI.

Question: Is the DebianInstaller going to be graphical in nature?

Answer: The DebianInstaller will not be graphical by nature, but modularity is a key in his design. It would allow the use of different kinds of frontends, including those of a graphical nature.

Question: Will the DebianInstaller support creating and installing to software RAID devices?

Answer: ???