Differences between revisions 11 and 12
Revision 11 as of 2007-06-29 09:53:13
Size: 1589
Editor: KevinMark
Comment: confused links and section
Revision 12 as of 2007-07-27 18:27:25
Size: 1591
Comment: social human behaviour experts RESOURCES, not direct links for contributing.
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 36: Line 36:
 * http://people.debian.org/~enrico/dcg/index.html The objectives are:
 * Submit for votation a good suggestion of Code of Conduct.
 * Helping to solve flamewars.
=== Resources for knowing a bit more about Debian Project culture: ===
 * A good suggestion of Code of Conduct http://people.debian.org/~enrico/dcg/index.html
Line 41: Line 45:
(I have no idea how the 'social ... experts' list relate to 'non-coders' helping debian. I can see asking for researcher to studing and report on how to improve debian like biella but these links make no sense-KevinMark)

?TableOfContents()

Is there a place for contributors other than developers?

The Debian Project needs many kinds of human knowledge. At this page you can find SOME examples and starting points. The list is not exhaustive.

Whatever skills you have, ask at users lists for guidance and include it here. http://lists.debian.org

Translators

Web Designers, Artists, Navigational and Usability experts, Copywriters

Lawyers, Accountants from all countries

Journalists, Copywriters, Marketeers, Branding experts

Event Promoters, Caterers, Host(ess)

Technical documentation writers

Users and Developers

Social human behaviour experts

The objectives are:

  • Submit for votation a good suggestion of Code of Conduct.
  • Helping to solve flamewars.

Resources for knowing a bit more about Debian Project culture: