1 21:37 < sepski> * sepski = Ronny Aasen
   2 21:37 < sepski> sorry for beeing late
   3 21:37 < winnie> sepski: no problem.. nothing has start yet...
   4 21:37 < winnie> your are the first one who wrote his name here
   5 21:38 < winnie> * winnie = Patrick Winnertz
   6 21:38 < sepski> only you and me ?
   7 21:38 < sepski> MUAHAHA we can decide everything ! :)
   8 21:38 < winnie> don't know... I don't hope so
   9 21:38 < winnie> :) okay let's start ;-)
  10 21:38 < winnie> :-P
  11 21:38 < oskar64> * oskar64 = Xavier Oswald
  12 21:39 < winnie> jever was around too (about 5 minutes ago)
  13 21:39 < sepski> fine :) should we decide to have the next meeting at a earlier time ? :)
  14 21:39 < jever> * jever = Juergen Leibner
  15 21:39 < winnie> sepski: yes, i think so
  16 21:39 < zobel> * zobel == too drunken
  17 21:39 < oskar64> zobel: :)
  18 21:39 < winnie> zobel: not good :)
  19 21:40 < sepski> :)
  20 21:40 < C14r> * C14r Christian Kuelker
  21 21:40 < sepski> since we'r few we need a good summery writer
  22 21:41 < winnie> anyone around who want's to do this?
  23 21:41 < C14r> I
  24 21:41 < sepski> cheers !
  25 21:41 < winnie> okay fine, insert yourself into the wiki :)
  26 21:41 < C14r> ok
  27 21:42 < sepski> 1: status of cipux.
  28 21:42 < kaplan> * kaplan = lior kaplan
  29 21:43 -!- winnie changed the topic of #debian-edu to: Meeting in progress | 1.1. status of cipux
  30 21:43 < oskar64> I will start and then C14r will speak..
  31 21:44 < oskar64> We changed a lots of thing and now we are ready for a new upload which will be done by me after this meeting
  32 21:44 < oskar64> please have a look here about the debian modifications : http://wiki.debian.org/DebianEdu/CipUX/ToDo
  33 21:45 < oskar64> I have a last point to fix cipux-rpc.postinst: unknown code snippet & unneeded echo call
  34 21:45 < oskar64> and then I will upload it.. that for my part..
  35 21:45 < oskar64> C14r: can you tell us more ?
  36 21:45 < winnie> oskar64: I think you work with the svn on svn.debian.org right?
  37 21:45 < oskar64> winnie: yes
  38 21:45 < oskar64> winnie: I have open a cipux project on alioth some months ago
  39 21:46 < winnie> oskar64: since I build it about an hour ago and get's a couple of lintian errors like this:
  40 21:46 < winnie> N: size is 428, argname is cipux_3.2.14-1_source.changes, filename is /home/winnie/svn/cipux/trunk/build-area/cipux_3.2.14-1.dsc
  41 21:46 < winnie> E: cipux_3.2.14-1_source.changes: file-size-mismatch-in-changes-file cipux_3.2.14-1.dsc
  42 21:46 < oskar64> I and C14r have do lots of commit since  1 hour ;)
  43 21:46 < winnie>  E: cipux_3.2.14-1_source.changes: md5sum-mismatch-in-changes-file cipux_3.2.14-1.dsc
  44 21:46 < winnie> okay I'll rebuild and check again
  45 21:46 < oskar64> and we are working with the 3.2.15 version !
  46 21:46 < winnie> autsch, okay
  47 21:47 < winnie> sry
  48 21:47 < oskar64> winnie: /cipux/trunk/cipux-core/ <-- this version
  49 21:47 < winnie> yeah, i only checked the wrong .changes
  50 21:48 < winnie> i haven't said anything, okay? ;-)
  51 21:48 < oskar64> winnie: and feel free to help us if you find mistakes ;)
  52 21:48 < oskar64> ok, np
  53 21:48 < oskar64> C14r: your turn ;)
  54 21:48 < C14r> ok
  55 21:48 < C14r> We make i18n working to 90% and going into translation on weekend for the GUI. Roland wrote the first draft of the user guide for CAT. We are setting up a CipUX demoserver after 2007-04-04, Testcase demo sever for the documentation team in running since a week.
  56 21:49 < C14r> So we did a lot of work this last 2 weeks, but the important question is: do the package go into debian-edu.
  57 21:49 < oskar64> :)
  58 21:50 < C14r> so oskar64 an kaplan it is your turn!
  59 21:50 < winnie> C14r: why don't you react to my test report last week?
  60 21:50 < oskar64> We will see if cipux will be accepted ;)
  61 21:50 < C14r> winnie: I ask binar to do it, bcause I was very busy at work
  62 21:51 < winnie> mh.. got no answer
  63 21:51 < C14r> winnie: If he didn't answer I can do it tomorrow
  64 21:51 < oskar64> for my part, I was very busy for 2 weeks but then, it's ok and I will do an upload and if cipux is reject I will correct what's wrong and reupload again and again util cipux is accepeted ;)
  65 21:52 < winnie> C14r: doesn't matter, i test a half hour ago and the most annoying thing (the cookie handling) was fixed.
  66 21:52 < C14r> winnie: yes that was fixed
  67 21:52 < C14r> we will have German on the week end
  68 21:53 < winnie> okay, but we should hurry up, there is not much time for the next points
  69 21:53 < C14r> some modules must be tested, so keep up testing!
  70 21:53 < C14r> winnie: ok
  71 21:53 < winnie> and it is quite late
  72 21:53 < winnie> something else about cipux?
  73 21:54 < jever> yes
  74 21:54 < winnie> jever: okay, but then hurry up please ;-)
  75 21:54 < jever> there is a commit list now where everyone who interests can read
  76 21:54 < jever> what is going on
  77 21:55 < oskar64> oh yes , nice jever ;)
  78 21:55 < C14r> http://sympa.cipworx.org/wws/subscribe/cipux-commits
  79 21:56 < winnie> okay, next point : 1.2 status of lwat
  80 21:56 < jever> that's all from me
  81 21:56 -!- winnie changed the topic of #debian-edu to: Meeting in progress | 1.2 status of lwat
  82 21:56 < winnie> i think finnarne is not around, so i will give a small summary
  83 21:57 < winnie> i discovered last week an security bug in lwat, which was fixed by me during one day
  84 21:58 < winnie> this bug concerned that the data which is already in the ldap wasn't checked for malicious codeblocks (e.g. javascript)
  85 21:59 < winnie> i want to try the same thing with cipux, but currently i don't have so much time
  86 21:59 < winnie> all needed things for user/group/netgroup administration does work now
  87 21:59 < winnie> and i heavily suggest that people start to test and report
  88 22:00 < jever> winnie: is the bug described somewhere so that another one can test that for cipux?
  89 22:00 < winnie> furthermore I want to write an debian-edu specific layout with the use of css
  90 22:00 < winnie> jever: yes, wait
  91 22:00 < jever> ok
  92 22:01 < winnie> but if there are some people around who would volunteer to write this css this would be nice ;-)
  93 22:01 < winnie> i'll write an email later
  94 22:01 < oskar64> I will have a look
  95 22:01 < winnie> so..that's all from me.. any questions?
  96 22:01 < winnie> oskar64: thanks
  97 22:02 < sepski> winnie, thanks we well test lwat :)
  98 22:02 < sepski> (more)
  99 22:02 < winnie> sepski: :)
 100 22:02 < winnie> okay.. then letÄs go to the next topic...
 101 22:02 -!- sepski changed the topic of #debian-edu to: Meeting in progress | 2 status of slbackup
 102 22:03 < sepski> status: slabckups web admin frontend is gone becouse webmin is gone : does anyone have anything else to report on this ?
 103 22:04 < C14r> sepski: no, but what is needed to write a GUI?
 104 22:04 < winnie> sepski: nope.. i think we need a new frontend :S
 105 22:04 < winnie> jever: here is the bugnumber: 415379
 106 22:04 < C14r> winnie: yes
 107 22:04 < jever> can we skip slbackup and use another tool like backuppc?
 108 22:04 < oskar64> winnie: ok, I will keep this bugnumber in mind.. and maybe begin something
 109 22:05 < sepski> jever, if someone have the manhouers to do it, sure
 110 22:05 < jever> winnie: thx
 111 22:05 < sepski> jever, preferably something not much larger :)
 112 22:06 < winnie> sepski: i think we should only write an small!! and simple console front end maybe?
 113 22:06 < winnie> and for the next release something else?
 114 22:06 < jever> sepski: it is a debian package and can does very well job at work for me
 115 22:07 < jever> -can
 116 22:07 < jever> and it breaks not the concept, having a backup on disk
 117 22:07 < sepski> winnie, does not the slbackup package contain console tools ?
 118 22:08 < winnie> sepski: not sure.. i have never looked at it ;-)
 119 22:08 < sepski> jever, i have tried it.
 120 22:09 < jever> if I provide a preconfigured config file can someone help me to bring it on CD?
 121 22:09 < sepski> well we can conclude that works need to be done, and if someone have time, do it :)
 122 22:09 < sepski> jever, sure.
 123 22:09 < winnie> jever: yes of course
 124 22:09 < sepski> but backuppc is 10x the size of slbackup :)
 125 22:10 < jever> fine, then I may have time the next two weeks to give it a try
 126 22:10 < winnie> but should we go ahead for the next point? only 20 minutes left for 5 other points...
 127 22:10 < sepski> and is backuppc easy to use for a teacher to restore a students file ?
 128 22:10 < jever> go ahead please
 129 22:10 < winnie> jever: okay thanks
 130 22:10 -!- sepski changed the topic of #debian-edu to: Meeting in progress | 3 status of 2nd CD
 131 22:10 < oskar64> winnie: slbackup has a 'console frontend' AFAIK
 132 22:10 < jever> sepski: yes, it has a webinterface, where users can restore their own files ;-)
 133 22:11 < winnie> sepski: something about a cd based installation with 2 cds?
 134 22:12 < winnie> i think it doesn't work (yet)... but according to the discussion last week we think over using a dvd, don't we?
 135 22:12 < sepski> winnie, yes i belive so
 136 22:12 < sepski> i would like a dvd and a cd netinstall
 137 22:12 < winnie> sepski: mh... yes.. this sounds good
 138 22:12  * jever should by some dvd-players
 139 22:12 < winnie> sepski: so we have to change our cd a bit i think
 140 22:13 < sepski> winnie, yes and we should get more testing on the DVD
 141 22:13 < winnie> sepski: okay, fine... I'll download it tomorrow at work
 142 22:14 < winnie> sepski: should we move to point 4? status of etch?
 143 22:14 < sepski> yes
 144 22:14 < jever> yes
 145 22:14 -!- sepski changed the topic of #debian-edu to:  Meeting in progress | 4 status of etch
 146 22:15 < winnie> okay :) i have there a very hugh point
 147 22:15 < winnie> the expert installation is currently very broken... you can choose there to disable the root account and don't set an password for it...
 148 22:15 < oskar64> I have see
 149 22:15 < winnie> if you do this the ldap admin don't get any passwords
 150 22:16 < C14r> ups
 151 22:16 < sepski> can we preseed the sudo menu entry to do nothing ?
 152 22:16 < winnie> i will preseed this question, is that right?
 153 22:16 < sepski> winnie, try it :)
 154 22:16 < winnie> sepski: i'll do this tomorrow or at saturday ;-)
 155 22:16 < sepski> il try to get time to test it
 156 22:16 < winnie> sepski: i think this question is preseedable
 157 22:17 < winnie> if you preseed the question "set a password or disable root account?" the user is forced to set one
 158 22:17 < winnie> any other comments about the status of the cd?
 159 22:18 < winnie> has anybody tests it?
 160 22:18 < winnie> i've test it today again and the normal setup works perfectly
 161 22:18 < oskar64> winnie: I have tested it and it runs fine
 162 22:18 < jever> no, but I will do so next week
 163 22:19 < sepski> normal install worked ok last time i tried.
 164 22:19 < sepski> we might want to spend more time testing services
 165 22:19 < sepski> forinstance we know samba have issues
 166 22:19 < jever> which?
 167 22:19 < winnie> sepski: yes definitly... but i don't have anything to test samba here :S
 168 22:20 < oskar64> same for me :/
 169 22:20 < winnie> sepski: and we should consider if we can somehow set the password for the nagiosadmin user the same as the rootpw
 170 22:20 < C14r> same for me :)
 171 22:20 < jever> I have, but what to look for?
 172 22:20 < C14r> winnie: realy?
 173 22:21 < C14r> \me knows a skolelinux sarge school where nagios was cracked ...
 174 22:21 < oskar64> uhh
 175 22:21 < C14r> but it might be different with etch ...
 176 22:21 < sepski> can you do a lot of damage from nagios ?
 177 22:22 < C14r> you gain at least rights of the webserver
 178 22:22 < sepski> winnie, eiter that or disable access until a pw is set
 179 22:22 < oskar64> winnie: we should firstly check nagios status in etch and have a look to bugreport..
 180 22:22 < winnie> sepski: okay.. but then we must describe somewhere how to do this
 181 22:22 < winnie> oskar64: yes of course :)
 182 22:23 < oskar64> Im against the idea of having the rootpw same as user admin in nagios..
 183 22:23 < sepski> oskar64,  i dont like that either
 184 22:23  * jever too
 185 22:23 < winnie> oskar64: but having per default 'skolelinux' as password is also very bad
 186 22:23 < jever> winnie: right
 187 22:23 < C14r> winnie: yes
 188 22:23 < sepski> better to have no access at all untill the password is set then
 189 22:23 < C14r> where is nagios saving this password?
 190 22:23 < oskar64> winnie: that's too :)
 191 22:23 < sepski> htpasswd
 192 22:24 < sepski> regular apache access afaik
 193 22:24 < jever> yes
 194 22:24 < winnie> sepski: mh.. but then we have to describe somewhere how they can easily add this
 195 22:24 < C14r> sepski: you can not save a root password in htaccess, that is very dangerous.
 196 22:24 < sepski> debian-edu-config/etc/nagios/debian-edu/htpasswd.users
 197 22:24 < C14r> C14r: its is very easy to exploid
 198 22:24 < sepski> C14r, yes
 199 22:25 < oskar64> we can close this point and go ahead maybe, it's late..
 200 22:25 -!- sepski changed the topic of #debian-edu to:  Meeting in progress | 5 status of ppc & amd64
 201 22:25 < oskar64> h01ger: ping ?
 202 22:26 < oskar64> I have a little bit to say about powerpc.. if h01ger is not here..
 203 22:26 < winnie> oskar64: okay. go ahead :)
 204 22:26 < oskar64> ok
 205 22:27 < oskar64> So I will do some debian-edu test since I have a pegasos2 but my cpu fan is broken and I have to buy I new one..
 206 22:27 < oskar64> And I think I can give an ssh account if it's needed..
 207 22:27 < oskar64> moreover I will work on getting the efika working with debian-edu
 208 22:27 < oskar64> that's after etch !
 209 22:28 < oskar64> that's all for me.. jsut for information..
 210 22:28 < jever> oskar64: is there a need to get prep machines in action?
 211 22:28 < oskar64> jever: I think the efika could be a very nice thin client !
 212 22:29 < jever> or are they to old to be involved in powerpc?
 213 22:29 < jever> the prep ones I mean
 214 22:29 < jever> I have one IBM RS6000
 215 22:30 < oskar64> efika is a new powerpc board !
 216 22:30 < oskar64> and pegasos2 is quite new too
 217 22:30 < oskar64> it's selled by genesi
 218 22:30 < winnie> mh... should we go ahead to the next topic? i think the one hour is almost over ;-)
 219 22:30 < oskar64> and efika could be a nice thin client server too I think
 220 22:30 -!- sepski changed the topic of #debian-edu to:  Meeting in progress | 6 OLPC ideas (Xavier)
 221 22:31 < oskar64> ok, I need only 2 minutes for this point ;)
 222 22:31 < oskar64> As you know, there is no really OLPC team in debian, and we are quite 10 people
 223 22:31 < oskar64> having an OLPC board so, it's time to do something.
 224 22:31 < oskar64> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianEdu/OLPC
 225 22:31 < oskar64> Then I contacted the emdebian team http://www.emdebian.org/ if we can join their
 226 22:31 < oskar64> team to get debian working on this board. There were some answer to my mail and
 227 22:31 < oskar64> it's really positive.
 228 22:31 < oskar64> Here is the thread : http://lists.debian.org/debian-embedded/2007/03/msg00091.html
 229 22:31 < oskar64> If you want to join the team, please send a mail to wookey(wookey@debian.org)
 230 22:31 < oskar64> with your wanted login and your ssh key.
 231 22:31 < oskar64> To finish, we will use the debian-embeded mailing list for the developement.
 232 22:31 < oskar64> Otherwise there are some software related to OLPC, Im thinking about Sugar, can
 233 22:31 < oskar64> I/We use the debian-edu repo to maintain it? http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Sugar_on_Debian
 234 22:31 < oskar64> Thanks.
 235 22:33 < sepski> great
 236 22:33 < C14r> oskar64: what das Sugar do?
 237 22:33 < oskar64> Sugar is the core of the OLPC Human Interface
 238 22:34 < C14r> oh, ok I read that somewhere, thx1
 239 22:34 -!- sepski changed the topic of #debian-edu to:  Meeting in progress | 7 Next meeting, and who will announce it.
 240 22:34 < oskar64> and otherwise, if you want an olpc, you can ask knut
 241 22:35 < kaplan> oskar64, I'm interested with packaging this for debian... (although you know my time constraints)
 242 22:35 < C14r> oskar64: keep me informend, may be I have to work on embedded systems.
 243 22:35 < oskar64> kaplan: ok, we will speak about this later
 244 22:35 < oskar64> C14r: ok
 245 22:35 < winnie> mh.. i think we should have our next meeting 2 hours earlier
 246 22:35 < winnie> this was much too late
 247 22:35 < oskar64> winnie: one is enough
 248 22:35 < sepski> 1.5?
 249 22:36 < oskar64> lol
 250 22:36 < C14r> Next meeting?
 251 22:36 < oskar64> In two weeks ?
 252 22:36 < C14r> fine
 253 22:36 < winnie> oskar64: yes in two weeks
 254 22:37 < C14r> 2007-04-12
 255 22:37 < winnie> 1.5 hours earlier I would suggest
 256 22:37 < C14r> 1.25?
 257 22:37 < winnie> hopefully etch is released there
 258 22:37 < winnie> 1.5
 259 22:37 < sepski> 18:00 utc 20:00 in +2 ?
 260 22:37 < oskar64> yes
 261 22:38 < oskar64> winnie: there are 30 remaining RC bugs for etch :/
 262 22:38 < jever> ack
 263 22:38 < winnie> oskar64: i think this will be possible
 264 22:38 < oskar64> yes
 265 22:39 < C14r> ok is the meeting  over now? winnie?
 266 22:39 < kaplan> oskar64, 61
 267 22:39 < winnie> C14r: i think so... or has anybody another point to discuss??
 268 22:40 < C14r> winnie: no
 269 22:40 < winnie> I'm closing some of the bugzilla bugs atm...
 270 22:40 -!- sepski changed the topic of #debian-edu to:  next meeting 2007-04-12 at 18.00 UTC, agenda at http://wiki.debian.org/DebianEdu/Meeting | debian-edu devel channel | test release 02 is out | test release 03 work in progress, download at ftp://ftp.skolelinux.no/cd-etch-test | please test the daily builds and coordinate the development | report your findings in http://wiki.debian.org/DebianEdu/Status/Etch
 271