Differences between revisions 3 and 18 (spanning 15 versions)
Revision 3 as of 2007-06-07 01:21:31
Size: 1365
Comment: cosmetics
Revision 18 as of 2019-11-25 12:29:09
Size: 2736
Editor: leela52452
Comment: updated http - https on debian list URLs
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
For the moment, this pages tries to summarise the brainstorm started on -devel. This pages tries to summarise the brainstorm started on -devel about handling huge data packages.
Line 3: Line 3:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/06/msg00273.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/06/msg00273.html
Line 5: Line 5:
||Solution ||Ressource-hungry||Official||data in .deb format||Easy to apt||Local processing|| ||Solution ||Resource-hungry||Official||data in .deb format||Easy to apt||Local processing||
Line 17: Line 17:
Other tools to create Debian binary packages are cmake, checkinstall, alien and equivs.

=== Some other ideas ===

 * [[Projects/DebSrcData]].
 * Regular Debian package from a "dummy" orig source. https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/06/msg00298.html
 * Per user package management. https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/06/msg00371.html
 * Script to download/update, unpack and index public databases http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/debian-med/trunk/community/infrastructure/getData/?rev=0&sc=0
 * [[https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/87tzgm6yee.fsf@vorlon.ganneff.de|data.debian.org]]
 * For CDs / DVDs, move these data files to multi-arch https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/06/msg00317.html
Line 18: Line 29:
Line 23: Line 33:

=== Further discussion threads ===

  * Nexuiz was temporarily bigger than a CD: [[https://lists.debian.org/debian-cd/2009/11/msg00030.html|debian-cd]] [[https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/11/msg00767.html|debian-devel]] [[https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=557218|bug tracker]] (each location has some non-crossposted mails)
  * Discussion on debian-devel: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/87tzgm6yee.fsf@vorlon.ganneff.de
  * Discussion two years later on the DebianScience list: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20100508140545.GA19587@meiner

----

CategoryDeveloper CategoryPackaging

This pages tries to summarise the brainstorm started on -devel about handling huge data packages.

https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/06/msg00273.html

Solution

Resource-hungry

Official

data in .deb format

Easy to apt

Local processing

Package as usual

yes

yes

yes

yes

no

Packgage data and provide processing scripts to other packages

yes, but less duplication

yes

yes

not fine-grained

automated

Dummy package

no

yes

no

yes

manual

Packaged cron script

no

yes

no

yes

automated

Wrapper

no

yes

yes

yes

automated

Fink

no

yes (.info files)

no

no, but fink can manage dependencies

automated

New branch separated from main

optional miroring

yes

yes

yes

no

Unofficial repository

not for Debian

no

yes

needs a key?

no

dpkg --admindir=$HOME/somedirectory

depends

depends

yes

no

no

Other tools to create Debian binary packages are cmake, checkinstall, alien and equivs.

Some other ideas

Biggest space consumers

  • Games data,
  • Scientific data,
  • -dbg packages.

Further discussion threads


CategoryDeveloper CategoryPackaging