Differences between revisions 9 and 10
Revision 9 as of 2013-01-21 18:58:35
Size: 12428
Editor: ?MatthiasKlumpp
Comment: Few more layout fixes
Revision 10 as of 2013-01-21 19:00:55
Size: 12428
Editor: ?MatthiasKlumpp
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 56: Line 56:
'''Description''': Any executable this package provides in /usr/bin. See (This would close [[DebianBug:468132|Bug #638517]]) <<BR>> '''Description''': Any executable this package provides in /usr/bin. See (This would close [[DebianBug:638517|Bug #638517]]) <<BR>>

Title: Extend Debian Package Metadata and add AppStream Features
DEP: 11
State: CANDIDATE
Date: 2011-10-12
URL: http://wiki.debian.org/DEP-11
Source: http://wiki.debian.org/DEP-11?action=info
Drivers: Matthias Klumpp <matthias@tenstral.net>,
 Julian Andres Klode <jak@debian.org>,
 Michael Vogt <mvo@debian.org>
License: GPL-3
Abstract:
 Proposal to enhance metadata exposed by Debian packages, as
 well as adding new files to Debian repositories which provide
 all data required for the cross-distro application manager
 project AppStream.

This is an updated Draft of DEP-11! If you want the old version, please look here.

This page contains a proposal how Debian could provide useful package metadata to applications and users and implement an own version of the cross-distribution AppStream specifications so we can get rid of big packages like "app-install-data".

The proposed solution will resolve two problems:

  • Implement a Debian-style version of the AppStream project metadata to provide information about available applications

  • Provide new metadata describing the components a package contains.

AppStream is a cross-distro effort to provide an application manager ("AppStore") for all distributions, with advanced features like ratings & reviews. It uses the well-known Open Collaboration Service API to achieve this. The project should also improve collaboration with upstreams as well as collaboration with other distributions (packages can be compared easily using this metadata - useful for e.g. sharing patches) More (and detailed) info about AppStream can be found at Freedesktop.Distributions.

Component metadata in binary packages

Additions to the "Provides" field

We propose the addition of additional component metadata in binary Debian packages "Provides" fields, which might be referenced by other packages "Suggests" fields. (No other fields should make use of this metadata elements, as they likely are provided by multiple packages and might cause a lot of trouble)

Components are for example shared libraries, pkg-config files, KDE-Plasma-Dataproviders, Fonts, Codecs, Firmware, Perl modules, Python-Modules, Haskell modules, printer drivers, etc. This information can be used by applications to automatically load missing functionality on request. This is already implemented for RPM-based distributions using PackageKit. Applications trying to use PackageKit to search for components on Debian will get very bad results at the moment due to missing metadata. (Currently, we're guessing the components by package names)

Metadata is defined in the form "type<name>", for example:

Provides: exec<foobar>, lib<libfoo.so.2>, python3<foobar>, mime<text/x-foobar>

By doing this, people can advise apt-get to install a missing mime-type, or a missing library, Perl module or anything else which is a supported component type. The component metadata types cannot be confused with normal package names, because brackets are not allowed in normal package names. The "Provides" line should only provide reference to components (= resources) this package supports, and not applications, since doing that would result in a large mess.

A list of possible components can be found here. We suggest the following component-types to be supported:

Supported component types

Type-Name: exec
Description: Any executable this package provides in /usr/bin. See (This would close Bug #638517)
Example: exec<nano>

Type-Name: plasma-service
Description: The Plasma services (KDE4 desktop) this package provides.
Example: plasma-service<weather>

Type-Name: lib
Description: Lists all shared libraries this package provides.
Example: lib<libprojectM.so.2>, lib<libogg.so>, lib<some-gstreamer-plugin.so.1>

Type-Name: python2
Description: A list of all Python2 modules this package provides

Type-Name: python3
Description: A list of all Python3 modules this package provides

Type-Name: mime
Description: The "MimeType" field of the .desktop file, one mime entry per mime type.

Type-Name: modalias
Description: A list of "modalias" globs representing the hardware types (for example USB, PCI, ACPI, DMI) this package handles. Useful for installing printer drivers or other USB protocol drivers for smartphones, firmware, kernel drivers which are not merged upstream yet or whatever else.

Type-Name: firmware
Description: A list of firmware files included in the package, to make it possible to find the right firmware package to install for a given kernel driver.

Proposal for AppStream support

The AppInfo index file

We propose the addition of a new index file for Application installers such as Software-Center, in order to replace the manually maintained app-install-data package, as that package needs to mirror and scan large portions in order to build, and is thus not very up-to-date.

Moving the meta-data to the server side allows for up-to-date information about the available applications, and should thus be a useful thing. The metadata we need is the information from the .desktop files in /usr/share/ applications/ together with the icons used for those .desktop files.

Proposed format

AppStream suggested the use of an XML file for providing the meta information. As Debian does not use XML anywhere else in the archive, and we do not expect anyone in Debian to like XML, we propose to use a simple RFC822-style Debian-style format for the index.

Here is a list of the fields we propose for this index file.

Fields

A block needs to contain a "Package" field and a "Architectures" field, as well as an "Application" and/or additional fields describing which components this package provides. Every field referring to a .desktop-file is not required if a package does not provide an application with a graphical UI.

Basic fields

Basic fields which are always required.

Field-Name: Package
Description: The same as in a Packages file

Field-Name: Version
Description: The same as in a Packages file. Used to associate the components described with exactly one .deb package. (And to display a version for applications)

Field-Name: Architectures
Description: Contains all architectures this package has been built for (amd64, i386, armel, kfreebsd-*, etc.) Additional field not present in AppStream stuff, included here to uniquely associate a .desktop file with exactly one .deb file. It also makes it possible to exclude metadata if a package is not (yet) present on one architecture, avoiding lots of duplication and wasted disk space.

Application fields

Fields describing the application this package ships, for use in software-center-like applications.

Field-Name: Application
Description: Name of a .desktop file, should serve as unique identifier In practice, the name of a .desktop file is not always unique, for example packages building optimized and unoptimized versions of the application.

Field-Name: Name
Description: The "Name" field of the .desktop file

Field-Name: Name-<lang>
Description: Localized Name, The "Name[lang]" field of the .desktop file

Field-Name: Summary
Description: The "Comment" field of the .desktop file

Field-Name: Summary-<lang>
Description: Localized Comment, The "Comment[lang]" field of the .desktop file

Field-Name: Keywords
Description: The "Keywords" field of the .desktop file

Field-Name: Keywords-<lang>
Description: Localized Keywords, The "Keywords[lang]" field of the .desktop file

Field-Name: Icon
Description: The name of the icon, created from the .desktop "Icon" field This one is a bit more complicated, in case the original icon was a path, we need to rename it to something that is not a path, for example, by replacing separators with underscores

Field-Name: Categories
Description: The "Categories" field of the .desktop file, post-processed The "Categories" field of a .desktop file is separated by semicolons, we probably want to use comma here.

Field-Name: Homepage
Description: As in the packages file This one appears in the original XML specification, we could read it from the packages file, but it probably does no harm to copy it here, so we have all display information in one place.

Location in the Archive

We propose that the indices are provided alongside the packages files, that is in dists/<SUITE>/<COMPONENT>/AppInfo.xy and compressed with whatever ftpmaster wish to compress with. This file will only be downloaded on demand, e.g. the Software Center could download it. On servers this file is not really required.

Application Icons

We also need to store the icons for the applications somewhere and provide e.g. a tarball of those icons as part of the archive. That tarball could be located at something like dists/<SUITE>/<COMPONENT>/Applications-Icons.tar.gz.

The icons in the tarball should probably be 32x32 sized and located in the "icons/32x32" sub-directory, at least according to the AppStream site. We could also deal with other schemes.

Implementation

Apt

Most stuff is already done here as part of a GSoC project to make Apt support more metadata. It still has to be discussed to allow "<" and ">" in a packages "Provides" field in order to support component metadata.

debhelper

In order to not have every packager maintain the metadata on his own, we suggest auto-generating the data using a small debhelper script (dh_components, dh_metadata, ...) and adding it to the package. This will add the missing data quickly.

Implementation Hints for ftpmaster (generation of !AppInfo file)

This only touches the AppStream data, because this is the data we have to generate on the server. ftpmaster might want to look at app-install-data's extractor code (for example, on git) for hints how icons can be located and named. All data can be generated by one script and be updated per-package, so the use of resources should be low. Much information can already be generated by just scanning the Contents.tar.gz file.

Client-side implementation

The data from the ComponentMetadata file will be used to generate a Xapian database, like the AppStream code does. The only difference is that we won't generate the Xapian DB from XML files. This Xapian database will then be queried by the Software Center or another Application Managament Tool. The component information will be fetched via apt and be available for PackageKit and APTDaemon, so other applications can make use of it.

The Fedora approach

In Fedora a similar feature is implemended using the Provides RPM field. Supported MIME types are listed like 'mimehandler(text/plain)' in the list of provides for a given RPM, and provided fonts are listed like 'font(?FontName)' in the same field. Similar is done for Perl modules using 'perl(module)', Tex packages using 'tex(packagename)', Ocaml modules using ocaml(modulename), Windows DLLs using mingw32(dllname), Mono using mono(module) and gstreamer feature using gstreamer0.10(feature). This make it possible to install a package using the modules, fonts or mime types provided by a given package. To install a special tex package, a simple 'yum install tex(packagename)' will install it.

More information is available from

FAQ

Comments