linda is gone.
|Deletions are marked like this.||Additions are marked like this.|
|Line 62:||Line 62:|
|* Output of lintian / linda ?||* Output of lintian ?|
This proposal is a very far-reaching proposal which started from the discussion about OrphanedPackages and which has been discussed IRL during the QA meeting (see [http://meetings-archive.debian.net/pub/debian-meetings/2005/qa-meeting-darmstadt/ the videos here]). Everybody interested by this proposal is welcome to join the [http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/collab-maint-devel collab-maint-devel] mailing list.
- [wiki:/Design Suggested design for the infrastructure]
- [wiki:/Status Some news about the actual status of this proposal]
We want to setup a complete infrastructure for handling the maintenance of (sets of) Debian packages. This infrastructure is meant to be used in several cases which have different expectations about such an infrastructure. Namely :
- Usual co-maintenance (like pkg-gnome.alioth.debian.org) with Debian developers and external contributors
- Co-maintenance of orphaned packages by the Debian QA Group
- Packages from future Debian developers who are currently in the NM process
- Packages from future MOTU which are in the MOTU School
- Packages created by Ubuntu's MOTUs which must be integrated in Debian (to avoid divergence)
Goals and expected benefits
- Make it easier for external contributors to help in the maintenance of Debian packages
- Make it easier for Debian developers to sponsor and mentor volunteers
- Make it possible for external contributors to maintain packages even if they don't want to become Debian developers
- (this is only possible if the sponsoring process works well and that's why we need to improve our tools to make that easier)
How do we do that ?
Collaborative maintenance means using a Version Control System (VCS). Subversion being the most popular choice nowadays, we'll use this one as the basis of this proposal. However the infrastructure must be designed in a VCS-agnostic manner: it must be possible to write modules to add support of other VCS.
So the main part of the infrastructure is a subversion repository. Packages are handled like usual with svn-buildpackage in their own directory. Up to now, this is nothing new as many people already do it. We need to add meta-information in the repository and provide several services to ease the work of everyone.
What needs to be done
Meta-information to integrate in the infrastructure
- A "maintenance-status" field describing each package :
- orphaned: packages without regular maintainer
- mentored: packages from someone who wants to become DD/MOTU (may also be a group of future DD/MOTU)
- maintained: packages where a regular DD/MOTU is in the maintenance team
- lowmaint: packages maintained by external contributors with no regular DD/MOTU in the team
- An "upload-status" field (associated to the current version) :
- need-review / need-upload
- ready-for-upload / needs-more-work
Access control layer
Since we want to open the access to many external contributors, we should be able to restrict their access to the packages that they are interested in. Of course the ACL (Access Control List) must be maintained by a group of trusted developers.
A (dynamic) web page must be created which describes the characteristics of all packages maintained in the repository :
- Does the package exist in Debian ? (in Ubuntu ?)
- Is the version in the repo newer than the version in unstable/experimental ?
- Does the maintainer look for a "sponsor" ? (~ is the package ready to be uploaded ?)
- Usual links :
- Package Tracking System
- Links to any "generated content" (see below)
Content generated automatically
- Diff between last version uploaded and actual version in repo
- Output of lintian ?
- Output of pbuilder run ? piuparts ?
- Generate an aptable source repository (possibility to download the last sources without using svn)
Automatic integration with Debian infrastructure
For example, it should be possible to configure the infrastructure so that each SVN commits sends a mail with the diff to the Package Tracking System.
Also, the system should follow uploads made to unstable/experimental and check that they come from the repository. If not it should reintegrate it in the repo. It should also inform the maintainers about this (unfortunate) event.
For beginners who are not ready to use SVN yet, we may have a Dak install so that people can upload sources packages which would then directly get injected in the repository (idea from [NeilMcGovern] reformulated by RaphaelHertzog).
Here are some other projects which should be contacted and which are working in the same direction :
Ubuntu is currently working on a tool called [http://revu.tauware.de/cgi-bin/trac.cgi REVU] which helps reviewing the packages from external contributors. See the [https://wiki.ubuntu.com/REVU2Spec specifications] in particular for good ideas.