Differences between revisions 9 and 11 (spanning 2 versions)
Revision 9 as of 2009-10-11 12:15:38
Size: 1284
Comment: Core cipux (and a bunch of dependent non-CipUX libraries) packaged for Etch.
Revision 11 as of 2009-10-11 13:03:31
Size: 1375
Comment: Change smileys for improved visual distinction between packaged and verified good.
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 16: Line 16:
 * :) :) cipux-task
 * :) :) cipux-object
 * :) :) cipux-storage
 * :) :) X-( cipux-task
 * :) :) :) cipux-object
 * :) :) :) cipux-storage
Line 20: Line 20:
 * :D :D :D module-build-cipux  * :)) :)) :)) module-build-cipux
Line 39: Line 39:
 * X-( Debian packaging fails e.g. in included build time regression tests
Line 41: Line 42:
 * :D Debian packaging known to work properly  * :)) Debian packaging known to work properly
Line 43: Line 44:
 * :) :D :) Packaged for Debian and backported to Lenny and Etch; known to work properly on Lenny  * :) :)) :) Packaged for Debian and backported to Lenny and Etch; known to work properly on Lenny

Status

Need to have

  • {1} cipux-cat-web

  • {2} cipux-cat-web-view-userlist

  • {1} cipux-trait-import / cipux-import

  • {1} cipux-trait-samba

  • {2} cipux-password

  • {2} cipux-rpc-client

  • {2} cipux-dog

  • :) :) cipux-rpc

  • :) :) cipux-rbac-simple

  • :) :) X-( cipux-task

  • :) :) :) cipux-object

  • :) :) :) cipux-storage

  • :) :) :) cipux

  • :)) :)) :)) module-build-cipux

Nice to have

  • {1} cipux-doc

  • {2} cipux-storage-ldap

    • (contents currently included in cipux-storage, and no alternate storage backend yet)

Not currently needed/used

  • {1} cipux-rbac

    • (rbac-simple is sufficient for current CipUX modules
  • {1} module-starter-cipux

    • (needed only as example skeleton files for developers of CipUX addon modules)

Legend

  • {1} Awaits official CipUX tarball release

  • {2} Awaits official Debian packaging release

  • X-( Debian packaging fails e.g. in included build time regression tests

  • :( Debian packaging suspected to need more work (i.e. all code is reliable but config files may be missing or wrong)

  • :) Debian packaging of unknown quality

  • :)) Debian packaging known to work properly

  • :) :) Packaged for Debian and backported to Lenny

  • :) :)) :) Packaged for Debian and backported to Lenny and Etch; known to work properly on Lenny