Document status

Preliminary support of this spec was implemented in

package

version

bug

vcs commit

dpkg

1.17.2

661538

git:7662e093 git:c87941de

sbuild

731798

apt

0.9.16.1

661537

git:565ded7b git:ce7f128c

python-apt

0.9.3.6

744243

git:c793c367

debhelper

9.20140227

git:f16d0915b

pbuilder

740577

lintian

2.5.22

740607

git:1f8821b8

dose3

3.1 (partial)

wanna-build

dak

744246

devscripts (mk-build-deps)

Uses libdpkg-perl so supports build profiles automatically

python-debian

libconfig-model-dpkg-perl

augeas

haskell-debian

Problem description

For some compilation scenarios it is required to build-depend on a different set of binary packages than specified in the Build-Depends line. The two most important scenarios are:

This specification describes two possible extensions of the Build-Depends field syntax. These extensions allow the marking of build dependencies as being needed or not needed when a specific build profile is activated. It also defines a new field called "Build-Profiles" which aids in marking binary packages as being built or not built whilst a certain build profile is activated or having been built with a certain set of build profiles activated.

Build profiles can be activated by setting the environment variable DEB_BUILD_PROFILES or by using the -P option with dpkg-buildpackage (or -o Apt::Build-Profiles for apt, or --profiles in sbuild). More than one build profile can be activated at a time. Multiple profiles are specified by separating them with commas in commandline arguments and by separating them with spaces in the DEB_BUILD_PROFILES environment variable. The initial profile names are "stage1", "stage2", "nocheck", "nobiarch" and "cross". Other possibilities are "nodoc" or "embedded".

Build-Depends syntax extension

An example demonstrating the build profile syntax:

Build-Depends: foo (>= 1.0) [i386 arm] <!profile.stage1 !profile.cross>, bar

This specification introduces a new pair of brackets (using < as the opening and > as the closing bracket) to be used after the architecture qualification list. Just as in the architecture qualification list the < and > brackets enclose a space separated list of terms called a restriction list.

Every term in the restriction list follows the following regular expression:

([a-z][a-z0-9-]*)\.([a-z][a-z0-9-]*)

The first group is called a namespace. The namespace "profile" is used to support build profiles and is the only allowed namespace for now. By introducing additional namespaces, this syntax can later be extended for other uses besides build profiles (for example an "arch" namespace can be introduced). No other namespace besides "profile" exists yet but it is forbidden to mix different namespaces within one restriction list. The second group is called a label and specifies the profile name.

Terms can be negated by using an exclamation mark as a prefix. In contrast to the architecture qualification list, positive and negative terms are allowed to be mixed. The semantics of a restriction list are computed as follows:

Above rules express the same semantics as architecture restrictions if positive and negative terms are not mixed. If positive and negative terms are mixed (and only then) then the order of the terms in the restriction list matters. The following table illustrates the implication of the above rules. Each cell indicates whether or not the dependency foo is dropped with a certain value of DEB_BUILD_PROFILES.

""

"stage1"

"nocheck"

"stage1 nocheck"

foo <!profile.stage1>

keep

drop

keep

drop

foo <profile.stage1>

drop

keep

drop

keep

foo <!profile.stage1 !profile.nocheck>

keep

drop

drop

drop

foo <profile.stage1 profile.nocheck>

drop

keep

keep

keep

foo <!profile.stage1 profile.nocheck>

keep

drop

keep

drop

foo <profile.nocheck !profile.stage1>

keep

keep

drop

keep

Future extensions

The Build-Profiles field

In debian/control binary package stanzas, the content of the Build-Profiles field specifies the (unordered) list of build profiles for which that binary package does or does not build. This list can either be all positive or all negative. Entries are negated by using an exclamation mark as a prefix.

Build-Profiles: !cross !stage1

If a binary package stanza in a debian/control file does not contain a Build-Profiles field, then it implicitly means that it builds with all build profiles.

The Built-For-Profiles field

In *.changes and Packages files, the content of the Built-For-Profiles field specifies the list of build profiles for which that binary or source package was built.

The DEB_BUILD_PROFILES environment variable

The DEB_BUILD_PROFILES environment variable contains a space separated unordered list of activated profiles. The content of this variable must be honored by all tools involved in package compilation. Here an example for debian/rules (enabling sql for any build except stage1 profile - notice the negated test):

ifneq ($(filter stage1,$(DEB_BUILD_PROFILES)),)
    DH_OPTIONS += -Nlibdb5.1-sql # not needed with debhelper (>= 9.20140227)
    CONFIGURE_SWITCHES += --disable-sql
else
    CONFIGURE_SWITCHES += --enable-sql
endif

Profile built binary packages

A binary package must offer the exact same functionality for all profiles with which it builds including no activated profile at all (if it builds in that case). Otherwise a package depending on that binary package might not find the functionality it expects it to provide. This means that if necessary binary packages have to be split or that a source package has to be built in two stages. This requirement can not technically be checked before ReproducibleBuilds happen.

Example

Imagine src:foo depends on bar which is needed to build a plugin that is shipped together with other plugins in the package foo-plugins. When bar is made optional as a build dependency of src:foo in a stage1 build, then the resulting stage1 binary package foo-plugins would differ from the foo-plugins package that is created during a full build. Thus the creation of the foo-plugins binary package must be disabled by using the Build-Profiles field in the foo-plugins binary package stanza and by adding the necessary bits to debian/rules for packages without debhelper or when build depending on debhelper (>> 9.20140227) is not desired.

If foo-plugins has reverse dependencies which are part of a cycle with src:foo itself, then not building foo-plugins would not solve the bootstrap problem. In that case it is necessary to either:

Other uses for the restriction syntax

Mark build dependencies that need to be translated when cross building

See CrossTranslatableBuildDeps#A3._Use_restriction_syntax_with_new_namespace

Replace Build-Depends-Indep and Build-Depends-Arch

Instead of moving build dependencies needed to build arch:all or arch:any packages into Build-Depends-Indep and Build-Depends-Arch, respectively, mark them directly in the Build-Depends field using <debbuildopt.archindep> and <debbuildopt.archdep>, respectively.

Map DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS to namespaces

Some DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS like nocheck or noopt could be mapped to <debbuildopt.nocheck> or <debbuildopt.noopt>. This would allow not needing to install certain dependencies if certain DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS are active.

Discussion