Differences between revisions 3 and 4
Revision 3 as of 2010-04-17 09:23:31
Size: 1298
Editor: GeoffSimmons
Comment: Respond to questions from BertrandMarc.
Revision 4 as of 2011-10-23 10:38:29
Size: 1539
Editor: ?kgoetz
Comment: suggesting more info on fglrx-source
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 23: Line 23:

== mentioning fglrx-source ==
Hi,
I'm wondering if fglrx-source (to compile the kernel module) should be mentioned explicitly, rather then rather vaugly in passing in the first para. -- [[kgoetz]] <<DateTime(2011-10-23T20:08:27+0930)>>

Support, Questions and other Discussions

Wiki pages aren't effective place for discussion.
Use the mailing-lists or IRC instead. see http://www.debian.org/support
(Hint: Later, contribute the solution to the appropriate documentations)

/etc/modules

Is it really necessary to add fglrx in /etc/modules ? -- ?BertrandMarc 2009-08-27 11:38:10

  • It appears to be completely unnecessary. Removed from all procedures as of page revision 26. -- GeoffSimmons 2010-04-17 09:23:31

aticonfig --initial ?

There is no xorg.conf in Squeeze by default... maybe we could write something about this. Or use aticonfig --initial ? -- ?BertrandMarc 2009-08-27 11:38:10

  • This is also true for Lenny. A minimal example xorg.conf is provided in the Lenny and Squeeze procedures.

    If aticonfig can produce valid configurations - see 504692 for a case against use of a similar tool - please feel free to add. -- GeoffSimmons 2010-04-17 09:23:31

mentioning fglrx-source

Hi, I'm wondering if fglrx-source (to compile the kernel module) should be mentioned explicitly, rather then rather vaugly in passing in the first para. -- ?kgoetz 2011-10-23 10:38:27