0
Comment: wiki.d.o isn't a report bug
|
595
would it be DFSG ?
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 1: | Line 1: |
#language en There's an active debate about bug #422137 on debian-devel: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/05/msg00043.html In case someone wants to start a new Debian subproject about this, then this wiki page could be used as a preliminary subproject homepage. = Discussion = I wonder if this package would comply with the DFSG ? I think any useful stuff should be packaged under Debian (google has 366000 hits for this package !). Having it in non-free section would be better than not having it at all, for those users. -- FranklinPiat [[DateTime(2007-10-21T10:03:05Z)]] |
There's an active debate about bug #422137 on debian-devel: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/05/msg00043.html
In case someone wants to start a new Debian subproject about this, then this wiki page could be used as a preliminary subproject homepage.
Discussion
I wonder if this package would comply with the DFSG ? I think any useful stuff should be packaged under Debian (google has 366000 hits for this package !). Having it in non-free section would be better than not having it at all, for those users. -- FranklinPiat ?DateTime(2007-10-21T10:03:05Z)